Uncertainty in marine weather routing

Thomas Dickson,Helen Farr,David Sear,James Blake

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1901.03840

2019-01-12

Abstract:Weather routing methods are essential for planning routes for commercial shipping and recreational craft. This paper provides a methodology for quantifying the significance of numerical error and performance model uncertainty on the predictions returned from a weather routing algorithm. The numerical error of the routing algorithm is estimated by solving the optimum path over different discretizations of the environment. The uncertainty associated with the performance model is linearly varied in order to quantify its significance. The methodology is applied to a sailing craft routing problem: the prediction of the voyaging time for an ethnographic voyaging canoe across long distance voyages in Polynesia. We find that the average numerical error is $0.396\%$, corresponding to $1.05$ hours for an average voyage length of $266.40$ hours. An uncertainty level of $2.5 \%$ in the performance model is seen to correspond to a standard deviation of $\pm 2.41-3.08\%$ of the voyaging time. These results illustrate the significance of considering the influence of numerical error and performance uncertainty when performing a weather routing study.

Numerical Analysis,Dynamical Systems

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to quantify the influence of numerical errors and performance model uncertainties in ocean weather route planning. Specifically, the paper focuses on:

1. **Quantification of numerical errors**: Estimate the numerical errors of the route - planning algorithm by solving the optimal path under different environmental discretizations. Numerical error refers to the error generated due to the algorithm's discretization of the environment, and this error will affect the accuracy of the prediction results.

2. **Quantification of performance model uncertainties**: Quantify the influence of its uncertainties by linearly changing the performance model. The performance model describes the performance of the ship under different environmental conditions, and its uncertainties may come from the inaccuracy of the model itself or the uncertainty of environmental data.

The paper selected a specific case study - the long - distance route prediction of Polynesian ethnic voyaging canoes - to demonstrate the effectiveness of the method. The study found that the average numerical error was 0.396%, corresponding to 1.05 hours in an average voyage time of 266.40 hours. A 2.5% uncertainty level in the performance model corresponded to a standard deviation of voyage time of ±2.41% to 3.08%. These results indicate that it is very important to consider the influence of numerical errors and performance model uncertainties when conducting weather route - planning research.