Preoperative spinal education for lumbar spinal stenosis: A feasibility study

James E. Eubanks,Zachary A. Cupler,Jordan A. Gliedt,Geronimo Bejarano,Richard L. Skolasky,Rob J. E. M. Smeets,Michael J. Schneider
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13140
2024-04-07
PM&R
Abstract:Introduction Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a leading cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain among older adults. A common and costly intervention for the treatment of LSS is lumbar decompression with or without fusion (LSS surgery), which has mixed outcomes among patients. Prehabilitation is a strategy designed to optimize the consistency of positive surgical outcomes and promote patient self‐efficacy, while attempting to mitigate postoperative complications. No efforts have investigated the prehabilitation strategies specifically for patients undergoing LSS surgery. Objective To determine the feasibility of delivery and acceptability by participants of a novel prehabilitation intervention for patients undergoing LSS surgery. Design Feasibility study. Setting Outpatient orthopedic clinic at an academic medical center. Participants Patients at least 50 years of age, who were scheduled for LSS surgery between October 2020 and October 2021. Intervention PreOperative Spinal Education for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (POSE‐LSS), is a novel multimodal, education‐focused, time‐efficient prehabilitation program for patients undergoing LSS surgery. Participants received the following: (1) Educational booklet and video; (2) In‐person physical therapy (PT) session; and (3) Telemedicine visit with a physiatrist. Main Outcome Measure(s) The primary outcomes of interest were feasibility and acceptability of intervention by participants. Key potential surgical outcomes were length of stay and discharge disposition. Results POSE‐LSS was completed by all eligible participants enrolled (n = 15) indicating feasibility and acceptability. Potential effectiveness measures including length of stay and discharge disposition were positively associated with the POSE‐LSS intervention. Conclusions This study demonstrates that a novel prehabilitation intervention is feasible, acceptable, and appears positively associated with important short‐term measures of postoperative recovery that may impact the trajectory of patient care following LSS surgery.
rehabilitation,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?