Abstract:The objective of this study was to assess the ability of finite element human body models (FEHBMs) and Anthropometric Test Device (ATD) models to estimate occupant injury risk by comparing it with field-based injury risk in far-side impacts. The study used the Global Human Body Models Consortium midsize male (M50-OS+B) and small female (F05-OS+B) simplified occupant models with a modular detailed brain, and the ES-2Re and SID-IIs ATD models in the simulated far-side crashes. A design of experiments (DOE) with a total of 252 simulations was conducted by varying lateral ΔV (10-50kph; 5kph increments), the principal direction of force (PDOF 50°, 60°, 65°, 70°, 75°, 80°, 90°), and occupant models. Models were gravity-settled and belted into a simplified vehicle model (SVM) modified for far-side impact simulations. Acceleration pulses and vehicle intrusion profiles used for the DOE were generated by impacting a 2012 Camry vehicle model with a mobile deformable barrier model across the 7 PDOFs and 9 lateral ΔV's in the DOE for a total of 63 additional simulations. Injury risks were estimated for the head, chest, lower extremity, pelvis (AIS 2+; AIS 3+), and abdomen (AIS 3+) using logistic regression models. Combined AIS 3+ injury risk for each occupant was calculated using AIS 3+ injury risk estimations for the head, chest, abdomen, and lower extremities. The injury risk calculated using computational models was compared with field-based injury risk derived from NASS-CDS by calculating their correlation coefficient. The field-based injury risk was calculated using risk curves that were created based on real-world crash data in a previous study (Hostetler et al., 2020). Occupant age (40 years), seatbelt use (belted occupant), collision deformation classification, lateral ΔV, and PDOF of the crash event were used in these curves to estimate field injury risk. Large differences in the kinematics were observed between HBM and ATD models. ATD models tended to overestimate risk in almost every case whereas HBMs yielded better risk estimates overall. Chest and lower extremity risks were the least correlated with field injury risk estimates. The overall risk of AIS 3+ injury risk was the strongest comparison to the field data-based risk curves. The HBMs were still not able to capture all the variance but future studies can be carried out that are focused on investigating their shortfalls and improving them to estimate injury risk closer to field injury risk in far-side crashes.

A Deterministic Method to Calculate the AIS Trauma Score from a Finite Element Organ Trauma Model (OTM)

A Generic Trauma Severity Computer Method Applied to Pedestrian Collisions

A proof of concept model to calculate white and grey matter AIS injuries in pedestrian collisions

Analysis of finite element models for head injury investigation: reconstruction of four real-world impacts

An injury mortality prediction based on the anatomic injury scale.

IMP-2005: an Injury Mortality Prediction According to the Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005

The Application For Skull Injury In Vehicle-Pedestrian Accident

Injury prediction in a side impact crash using human body model simulation

Assessment of finite element human body and ATD models in estimating injury risk in far-side impacts using field-based injury risk

Multi-Directional Dynamic Model for Traumatic Brain Injury Detection

On Scene Injury Severity Prediction (OSISP) model for trauma developed using the Swedish Trauma Registry

IMP-ICDX: an Injury Mortality Prediction Based on ICD-10-CM Codes

Human Brain Modeling with Its Anatomical Structure and Realistic Material Properties for Brain Injury Prediction

Evaluation of AIS3+ car occupant injuries using deterministic and probabilistic methods in frontal crashes

Preliminary injury risk estimation for occupants involved in frontal crashes by combining computer simulations and real crashes

A Traumatic Injury Mortality Prediction (TRIMP) Based on a Comprehensive Assessment of Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005 Predot Codes.

An Objective Injury Threshold for the Maximum Principal Strain Criterion for Brain Tissue in the Finite Element Head Model and Its Application

A Computational Biomechanics Human Body Model Coupling Finite Element and Multibody Segments for Assessment of Head/Brain Injuries in Car-To-Pedestrian Collisions

Embedded axonal fiber tracts improve finite element model predictions of traumatic brain injury

Development of Total Human Model for Safety Version 4 Capable of Internal Organ Injury Prediction

Crash Telemetry-Based Injury Severity Prediction is Equivalent to or Out-Performs Field Protocols in Triage of Planar Vehicle Collisions