A-332 Identifying At-Risk Patients Pre-IV Contrast Administration via POCT Creatinine Measurement

R Hawkins
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae106.326
IF: 12.114
2024-10-27
Clinical Chemistry
Abstract:BackgroundThe use of intravenous iodinated contrast in computerized tomography studies is associated with a small risk of acute kidney injury. Pre-existing chronic kidney disease is a recognized factor and assessment of renal function prior to contrast administration is essential. This study assessed the ability of the Abbott iSTAT creatinine assay to correctly identify IV-contrast patient risk using lab-based eGFR as the gold standard.MethodsThis was a retrospective study comparing POCT creatinine (whole blood, Abbott iSTAT enzymatic) and lab creatinine (plasma, Beckman Coulter AU5800 Jaffe) results on simultaneous samples collected in the emergency department. Anonymised data records were extracted from the laboratory database for 2020-2023. IV contrast risk was calculated using eGFR (CKD-EPI 2021) and classified as high risk (HR: eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), moderate risk (MR: eGFR 30-59) and low risk (LR: eGFR >=60) as per the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists 2018 guidelines, using the Beckman-based eGFR as the gold standard.Results132 paired samples patients were available for analysis (61% male, average age 69 y (23-98), 70% Chinese, eGFR (iStat) 3-143, eGFR (Beckman) 3-121 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ). The proportions of Beckman-based eGFR HR:MR:LR cases were 53:39:40. The prevalence of HR/MR cases was 70%. The diagnostic performance of the iSTAT-based eGFR to accurately identify HR/MR patients was: sensitivity 93.5%, specificity 95%, PPV 97.7%, NPV 86.4%, accuracy 93.9%. For different Beckman-derived eGFR categories, the mean difference in eGFR (iSTAT - Beckman), 95% lower limit of agreement (LOA) and upper LOA was: <30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 : -1.0, -3.2, -1.1; 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 : 0.9, -13.3, 15.1; >60 mL/min/1.73 m 2 : 1.6, -16.8, 20.1. Linear regression fit (Passing-Bablok): CKD-EPI Beckman = 1.193 + 0.9773 CKD-EPI iSTAT. Correlation coefficient was 0.981. Kappa for the 3 categories of risk classification was 0.814.ConclusionsThe iSTAT creatinine assay could reliably identify patients at medium/high risk of acute kidney injury following intravenous contrast administration. Performance was best for low and high risk patients with 100% of high risk patients being correctly identified. It is a useful screening test but differences in eGFR of up to 20 mL/min/1.73 m 2 may be seen between the Beckman and iSTAT eGFR values at higher levels, meaning numeric eGFR results are not interchangeable.
medical laboratory technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?