Abstract:Maintaining data quality is a fundamental requirement for any successful and long-term data management. Providing high-quality, reliable, and statistically sound data is a primary goal for clinical research informatics. In addition, effective data governance and management are essential to ensuring accurate data counts, reports, and validation. As a crucial step of the clinical research process, it is important to establish and maintain organization-wide standards for data quality management to ensure consistency across all systems designed primarily for cohort identification, allowing users to perform an enterprise-wide search on a clinical research data repository to determine the existence of a set of patients meeting certain inclusion or exclusion criteria. Some of the clinical research tools are referred to as de-identified data tools. Assessing and improving the quality of data used by clinical research informatics tools are both important and difficult tasks. For an increasing number of users who rely on information as one of their most important assets, enforcing high data quality levels represents a strategic investment to preserve the value of the data. In clinical research informatics, better data quality translates into better research results and better patient care. However, achieving high-quality data standards is a major task because of the variety of ways that errors might be introduced in a system and the difficulty of correcting them systematically. Problems with data quality tend to fall into two categories. The first category is related to inconsistency among data resources such as format, syntax, and semantic inconsistencies. The second category is related to poor ETL and data mapping processes. In this paper, we describe a real-life case study on assessing and improving the data quality at one of healthcare organizations. This paper compares between the results obtained from two de-identified data systems i2b2, and Epic Slicedicer, and discuss the data quality dimensions' specific to the clinical research informatics context, and the possible data quality issues between the de-identified systems. This work in paper aims to propose steps/rules for maintaining the data quality among different systems to help data managers, information systems teams, and informaticists at any health care organization to monitor and sustain data quality as part of their business intelligence, data governance, and data democratization processes.

Managing data quality in an existing medical data warehouse using business intelligence technologies

Data Delivery Workflow in an Academic Information Warehouse.

Information warehouse - a comprehensive informatics platform for business, clinical, and research applications.

Metadata Management Technology in Data Warehouse

Toward a Fully De-identified Biomedical Information Warehouse.

Development of a Clinical Data Warehouse for Hospital Infection Control

Data warehouse for quality management system

Data Warehouse for Quality Management Systems

A Simplified Approach for Quality Management in Data Warehouse

A Study on Building Data Warehouse of Hospital Information System.

The technology of using a data warehouse to support decision-making in health care

The Enterprise Data Trust at Mayo Clinic: a semantically integrated warehouse of biomedical data

Improving Data Quality in Clinical Research Informatics Tools

Assessing The Practice Of Data Quality Evaluation In A National Clinical Data Research Network Through A Systematic Scoping Review In The Era Of Real-World Data

Biomedical Data Warehouses

Medical Big Data Warehouse: Architecture and System Design, a Case Study: Improving Healthcare Resources Distribution

Making a Virtue of Necessity - A Highly Structured Clinical Data Warehouse as the Source of Assured Truth in a Hospital

Hospital on a page: standardizing data presentation to drive quality improvement

Analysis of Data Quality Problems in the Digital Hospital and Relevant Solutions

Study on the Data Warehouse of Pharmaceutical Information and Information Application

Data Quality Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities