Psychologists' experiences towards culturally responsive practices to strengthen social and emotional wellbeing with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clients

Emily Darnett,Andrew Peters,Monica Thielking
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2024.2356116
2024-05-29
Australian Journal of Psychology
Abstract:Objective This study aimed to explore psychologists experiences when providing culturally responsive psychological practice working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Footnote 1 clients.
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to explore the culturally responsive practices that psychologists adopt when providing psychological services to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in Australia, and how these practices enhance the Social and Emotional Wellbeing (SEWB) of the service recipients. The specific objectives of the study include: - Exploring the challenges, successful experiences, and unsuccessful attempts faced by psychologists when serving Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. - Highlighting the voices of Aboriginal psychologists, as they can provide valuable insights as holders of traditional knowledge. - Emphasizing the importance of reducing institutional barriers and improving psychology curricula in higher education to better prepare non-Indigenous psychologists to serve Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in a culturally responsive manner. Some key points mentioned in the paper include: - The worldviews of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people differ from Western worldviews, which affects their understanding and maintenance of mental health and wellbeing. - Psychology training primarily focuses on Western perspectives and lacks education on Indigenous wellbeing. - Currently, most mainstream psychological services are provided by non-Indigenous psychologists. The research methods included using a mixed-methods survey of 108 psychologists (83.2% female, 16.8% male; 13.9% Indigenous, 86.1% non-Indigenous), with ages ranging from 22 to 83 years. Participants completed an electronic mixed-methods survey, and the collected data were used for statistical analysis and content analysis to achieve the research objectives.