Abstract:We develop neural-network active flow controllers using a deep learning partial differential equation augmentation method (DPM). The end-to-end sensitivities for optimization are computed using adjoints of the governing equations without restriction on the terms that may appear in the objective function. In one-dimensional Burgers' examples with analytic (manufactured) control functions, DPM-based control is comparably effective to standard supervised learning for in-sample solutions and more effective for out-of-sample solutions, i.e., with different analytic control functions. The influence of the optimization time interval and neutral-network width is analyzed, the results of which influence algorithm design and hyperparameter choice, balancing control efficacy with computational cost. We subsequently develop adjoint-based controllers for two flow scenarios. First, we compare the drag-reduction performance and optimization cost of adjoint-based controllers and deep reinforcement learning (DRL) -based controllers for two-dimensional, incompressible, confined flow over a cylinder at Re=100 , with control achieved by synthetic body forces along the cylinder boundary. The required model complexity for the DRL-based controller is 4229 times that required for the DPM-based controller. In these tests, the DPM-based controller is 4.85 times more effective and 63.2 times less computationally intensive to train than the DRL-based controller. Second, we test DPM-based control for compressible, unconfined flow over a cylinder and extrapolate the controller to out-of-sample Reynolds numbers. We also train a simplified, steady, offline controller based on the DPM control law. Both online (DPM) and offline (steady) controllers stabilize the vortex shedding with a 99% drag reduction, demonstrating the robustness of the learning approach. For out-of-sample flows ( Re={50,200,300,400} ), both the online and offline controllers successfully reduce drag and stabilize vortex shedding, indicating that the DPM-based approach results in a stable model. A key attractive feature is the flexibility of adjoint-based optimization, which permits optimization over arbitrarily defined control laws without the need to match a priori known functions. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.013901 ©2024 American Physical Society

Neural networks in feedback for flow analysis and control

Neural networks in feedback for flow analysis, sensor placement and control

Flow control by a hybrid use of machine learning and control theory

Active flow control with rotating cylinders by an artificial neural network trained by deep reinforcement learning

Artificial Neural Networks in Fluid Dynamics: A Novel Approach to the Navier-Stokes Equations

Adjoint-based machine learning for active flow control

Almost Sure Exponential Stability of Stochastic Fluid Networks with Nonlinear Control.

Design of Finite Difference Method and Neural Network Approach for Casson Nanofluid Flow: A Computational Study

Deep model predictive flow control with limited sensor data and online learning

Artificial Neural Networks trained through Deep Reinforcement Learning discover control strategies for active flow control

Data-driven optimal control with neural network modeling of gradient flows

FEM-based Neural Networks for Solving Incompressible Fluid Flows and Related Inverse Problems

NeuralFluid: Neural Fluidic System Design and Control with Differentiable Simulation

Network-based analysis of fluid flows: Progress and outlook

NONLINEAR FLOW CONTROL USING A LOW DIMENSIONAL GALERKIN MODEL UDC 532.517:681.5

Neural Ideal Large Eddy Simulation: Modeling Turbulence with Neural Stochastic Differential Equations

Flowfield Reconstruction Method Using Artificial Neural Network

Stable Neural Flows

Sum-of-Squares approach to feedback control of laminar wake flows

Unsupervised neural networks for Maxwell fluid flow and heat transfer over a curved surface with nonlinear convection and temperature‐dependent properties