Abstract:Background: Digital mental health interventions, such as 2-way and asynchronous messaging therapy, are a growing part of the mental health care treatment ecosystem, yet little is known about how users engage with these interventions over the course of their treatment journeys. User engagement, or client behaviors and therapeutic relationships that facilitate positive treatment outcomes, is a necessary condition for the effectiveness of any digital treatment. Developing a better understanding of the factors that impact user engagement can impact the overall effectiveness of digital psychotherapy. Mapping the user experience in digital therapy may be facilitated by integrating theories from several fields. Specifically, health science's Health Action Process Approach and human-computer interaction's Lived Informatics Model may be usefully synthesized with relational constructs from psychotherapy process–outcome research to identify the determinants of engagement in digital messaging therapy. Objective: This study aims to capture insights into digital therapy users' engagement patterns through a qualitative analysis of focus group sessions. We aimed to synthesize emergent intrapersonal and relational determinants of engagement into an integrative framework of engagement in digital therapy. Methods: A total of 24 focus group participants were recruited to participate in 1 of 5 synchronous focus group sessions held between October and November 2021. Participant responses were coded by 2 researchers using thematic analysis. Results: Coders identified 10 relevant constructs and 24 subconstructs that can collectively account for users' engagement and experience trajectories in the context of digital therapy. Although users' engagement trajectories in digital therapy varied widely, they were principally informed by intrapsychic factors (eg, self-efficacy and outcome expectancy), interpersonal factors (eg, the therapeutic alliance and its rupture), and external factors (eg, treatment costs and social support). These constructs were organized into a proposed Integrative Engagement Model of Digital Psychotherapy. Notably, every participant in the focus groups indicated that their ability to connect with their therapist was among the most important factors that were considered in continuing or terminating treatment. Conclusions: Engagement in messaging therapy may be usefully approached through an interdisciplinary lens, linking constructs from health science, human-computer interaction studies, and clinical science in an integrative engagement framework. Taken together, our results suggest that users may not view the digital psychotherapy platform itself as a treatment so much as a means of gaining access to a helping provider, that is, users did not see themselves as engaging with a platform but instead viewed their experience as a healing relationship. The findings of this study suggest that a better understanding of user engagement is crucial for enhancing the effectiveness of digital mental health interventions, and future research should continue to explore the underlying factors that contribute to engagement in digital mental health interventions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04507360; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04507360

Psychotherapist perceptions of engagement‐building behaviours with youth clients across developmental levels

Psychotherapy Outcome at Youth Clinics — An Integrative Approach

Problem Sexual Behavior and Engagement in Therapeutic Intervention among Children Aged 4–12

An Integrative Engagement Model of Digital Psychotherapy: Exploratory Focus Group Findings

Brief presential and online psychodynamic psychotherapy: patients' perception

Making connections between school and home: Exploring therapists’ perceptions of their relationships with families in partnering for change

Identifying the Common Elements of Treatment Engagement Interventions in Children’s Mental Health Services

Engaging Minds: Toward Developing Psychoanalytic Candidates

Exploring service provider perspectives on service user engagement across service components in coordinated specialty care programs for psychosis.

Envisaging a thriving future: The integration of positive psychology into brief psychotherapy and family therapy practice

Conceptualizing Neighborhood Context in Youth Psychotherapy Research

Examining racial and ethnic differences in youth psychotherapy treatment engagement and outcomes.

Optimizing engagement in goal pursuit with youth with physical disabilities attending life skills and transition programs: an exploratory study

Is training effective? A study of counseling psychology doctoral trainees in a psychodynamic/interpersonal training clinic.

Engaging Older Adolescent Boys Into School-Based Mental Health Workshops: Testing Theory-Based Facilitators and Barriers in Focus Groups

Test of the phase model of psychotherapy in a training clinic.

Sociocultural Responsive Frameworks to Increase Engagement in Service Systems Through a Peer-to-Peer Model

Youth, caregiver, and clinician perspectives of youth Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in a psychological training clinic: lessons from early adopters

In This Issue, Psychoanalytic Dialogues 34-3

Developing a collaborative relationship with clients during the initial sessions of psychotherapy.

Successful strategies for parent engagement in play therapy: Voices through humanistic approaches.