Abstract:With the rapid development of remote sensing with small, lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), efficient and accurate crop spike counting, and yield estimation methods based on deep learning (DL) methods have begun to emerge, greatly reducing labor costs and enabling fast and accurate counting of sorghum spikes. However, there has not been a systematic, comprehensive evaluation of their applicability in cereal crop spike identification in UAV images, especially in sorghum head counting. To this end, this paper conducts a comparative study of the performance of three common DL algorithms, EfficientDet, Single Shot MultiBox Detector (SSD), and You Only Look Once (YOLOv4), for sorghum head detection based on lightweight UAV remote sensing data. The paper explores the effects of overlap ratio, confidence, and intersection over union (IoU) parameters, using the evaluation metrics of precision P, recall R, average precision AP, F1 score, computational efficiency, and the number of detected positive/negative samples (Objects detected consistent/inconsistent with real samples). The experiment results show the following. (1) The detection results of the three methods under dense coverage conditions were better than those under medium and sparse conditions. YOLOv4 had the most accurate detection under different coverage conditions; on the contrary, EfficientDet was the worst. While SSD obtained better detection results under dense conditions, the number of over-detections was larger. (2) It was concluded that although EfficientDet had a good positive sample detection rate, it detected the fewest samples, had the smallest R and F1, and its actual precision was poor, while its training time, although medium, had the lowest detection efficiency, and the detection time per image was 2.82-times that of SSD. SSD had medium values for P, AP, and the number of detected samples, but had the highest training and detection efficiency. YOLOv4 detected the largest number of positive samples, and its values for R, AP, and F1 were the highest among the three methods. Although the training time was the slowest, the detection efficiency was better than EfficientDet. (3) With an increase in the overlap ratios, both positive and negative samples tended to increase, and when the threshold value was 0.3, all three methods had better detection results. With an increase in the confidence value, the number of positive and negative samples significantly decreased, and when the threshold value was 0.3, it balanced the numbers for sample detection and detection accuracy. An increase in IoU was accompanied by a gradual decrease in the number of positive samples and a gradual increase in the number of negative samples. When the threshold value was 0.3, better detection was achieved. The research findings can provide a methodological basis for accurately detecting and counting sorghum heads using UAV.

Comparison of Object Detection Methods for Corn Damage Assessment Using Deep Learning

Comparison of object detection methods for crop damage assessment using deep learning

Comparison and Optimal Method of Detecting the Number of Maize Seedlings Based on Deep Learning

Comparison of Deep Learning Methods for Detecting and Counting Sorghum Heads in UAV Imagery

Identification of Corn Seeds with Different Freezing Damage Degree Based on Hyperspectral Reflectance Imaging and Deep Learning Method

A Convolutional Neural Network-Based Method for Corn Stand Counting in the Field

Comparison of Drone-Assisted Maize Seedling Detection Models Based on Deep Learning

Hyperspectral detection of fresh corn peeling damage using germinating sparse classification method

Identification and Grading of Maize Drought on RGB Images of UAV Based on Improved U-Net

Deep Learning-Based Object Detection System for Identifying Weeds Using UAS Imagery

Identification of Abnormality in Maize Plants From UAV Images Using Deep Learning Approaches

Non-destructive detection of defective maize kernels using hyperspectral imaging and convolutional neural network with attention module

Maize Tassel Detection From UAV Imagery Using Deep Learning

Integrating Automated Labeling Framework for Enhancing Deep Learning Models to Count Corn Plants Using UAS Imagery

Comparison of Object Detection and Patch-Based Classification Deep Learning Models on Mid- to Late-Season Weed Detection in UAV Imagery

Detecting volunteer cotton plants in a corn field with deep learning on UAV remote-sensing imagery

Application of Deep Learning Architectures for Accurate and Rapid Detection of Internal Mechanical Damage of Blueberry Using Hyperspectral Transmittance Data

DeepCorn: A semi-supervised deep learning method for high-throughput image-based corn kernel counting and yield estimation

Maize plant detection using UAV-based RGB imaging and YOLOv5

Maize-YOLO: A New High-Precision and Real-Time Method for Maize Pest Detection

Detection and Counting of Maize Leaves Based on Two-Stage Deep Learning with UAV-Based RGB Image