Abstract:Recently, the lack of diversity in startup leadership has been criticized by public figures and institutional investors as a signal of inadequate governance. And yet, little is known about the historical changes in gender diversity in entrepreneurial firms. Using a unique database of the gender composition in all entrepreneurial firm IPOs from 1990 to 2020 in the USA, we examine these changes. The IPO is a particularly interesting moment in an entrepreneurial firm's evolution, as governance evolves from a private firm directed by venture capitalists, with their beliefs about what a good management team is, into a public firm with owners who are institutional investors with potentially different goals and beliefs. Grounded in signaling theory, our expectation is that the changes in public investors' view of proper governance will result in changes in the gender in personnel added immediately prior to the IPO and that IPO teams will be more diverse than Early Teams when the firm was younger and controlled by its private investors. We suggest that the private investors such as venture capitalists have different mental models of what "good" members or top management and the board of directors are. We expect these models are particularly influential in the digital technologies where a "tech bros" model is dominant, and thus there is little "space" for women leaders, particularly in contrast to the university research-based biotechnology industry, which has not experienced such direct criticism. We find support for our propositions, and also document an increase in women directors and top management team members over time.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### The Problem the Paper Attempts to Solve
This paper aims to explore the changes in gender diversity (specifically the proportion of female leaders) in startups before and after their Initial Public Offering (IPO) and analyze how these changes reflect societal perceptions of good corporate governance standards.
### Specific Research Questions Include:
1. **Historical Changes**: Has the proportion of women in the top management team (TMT) and board of directors (BoD) of startups increased over the past 30 years?
2. **Changes Before and After IPO**: Is there a significant difference in gender diversity before and after the IPO? Specifically, is the proportion of women higher among team members who join immediately before the IPO?
3. **Industry Differences**: Are there differences in gender diversity among startups in different industries (e.g., digital technology industry and biomedical industry)?
4. **Impact of Time Periods**: Does the rate of change in gender diversity differ across different periods (1990-2000, 2001-2008, 2009-2020)?
5. **Application of Signaling Theory**: Do startups increase the number of female leaders to signal to institutional investors that they adhere to good governance standards?
### Research Background
In recent years, the lack of diversity in startup leadership has been criticized by public figures and institutional investors as a signal of poor corporate governance. However, little is known about the historical changes in gender diversity in startups. This paper uses data from all startup IPOs in the United States from 1990 to 2020 to explore these changes. The IPO is a particularly interesting moment because the company's governance structure shifts from being dominated by venture capitalists in a private company to being dominated by institutional investors in a public company, who may have different goals and beliefs.
### Main Hypotheses
1. **Overall Trend**: Over time, the proportion of women in the TMT and BoD of startups will gradually increase.
2. **Board vs. Management**: The proportion of women in the BoD will grow faster than in the TMT.
3. **Time Periods**: While the proportion of women in the TMT and BoD will show a long-term growth trend, the rate of growth will differ across different periods.
4. **Differences Before and After IPO**: The proportion of women among team members who join immediately before the IPO will be significantly higher than among those who join earlier.
5. **Industry Differences**: In the digital technology industry, due to the dominance of the "tech bro" culture, the initial proportion of women will be lower, but the proportion of women joining before the IPO will significantly increase as societal perceptions change. In the biomedical industry, due to its close ties with the academic research environment, the initial proportion of women will be higher, so the increase in the proportion of women joining before the IPO will be smaller.
### Methods
The research data comes from the IPO prospectuses of all 4872 startups listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and NASDAQ in the United States from 1990 to 2020. The research team analyzed the leadership background information in these documents to determine the gender of each individual and classified them as TMT and BoD members. The study also categorized members based on the time they joined the company into "early team" and "IPO team."
### Conclusion
The study found that the proportion of female leaders in startups has significantly increased over the past 30 years, especially after the 2008 financial crisis. The proportion of women among team members who join immediately before the IPO is significantly higher than among those who join earlier. Additionally, there are differences in the proportion of women across different industries, with the digital technology industry showing particularly notable growth. These results support the signaling theory, suggesting that startups increase the number of female leaders to signal to institutional investors that they adhere to good governance standards.