Are Overconfident Managers Born or Made ?

Matthew T. Billett
Abstract:We explore the source of managerial hubris in mergers and acquisitions by examining the history of deals made by individual acquirers. Our study has three main findings: (1) Compared to their first deals, acquirers of second and higher-order deals experience significantly more negative announcement effects; (2) While acquisition likelihood increases in the performance associated with previous acquisitions, previous positive performance does not curb the negative wealth effects associated with future deals; (3) Top management’s net purchase of stock is greater preceding high order deals than it is for first deals. We interpret these results as consistent with self-attribution bias leading to managerial overconfidence. We also find evidence that the market anticipates future deals based on an acquirer's acquisition history and impounds such anticipation into stock prices. JEL Classifications: G31; G32; G34 We thank Toby Daglish, Jon Garfinkel, David Hirshleifer, Kose John, Tyler Leverty, Erik Lie, David Mauer, Hamid Mehran, Harold Mulherin, Tom Rietz, Jay Sa-Aadu, Ashish Tiwari, Xiaoyun Yu, and seminar participants at the FMA Meetings, Northern Illinois University, University of Iowa, and University of Kansas for comments and suggestions. All remaining errors are our own. Henry B. Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1000; (319) 335-2626; email: matt-billett@uiowa.edu. Henry B. Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1000; (319) 335-0934; email: Yiming-Qian@uiowa.edu.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?