Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions in situ by the use of three commercially available sugar-free gums

David J Manton,Glenn D Walker,Fan Cai,Nathan J Cochrane,Peiyan Shen,Eric C Reynolds
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2008.00920.x
Abstract:Background: Commercially available sugar-free chewing gums have been claimed to provide oral health benefits. Aim: The aim of this randomized, double-blind crossover in situ study was to compare the efficacy of three commercially available sugar-free chewing gums: Trident White, Orbit, and Orbit Professional, in remineralizing enamel subsurface lesions in situ. Design: Specimens containing enamel subsurface lesions were sectioned into test and control half-slabs with the test half-slabs inserted into removable palatal appliances. For each test chewing period, subjects were randomly allocated one of three test gums. Subjects (n = 10) chewed the randomly allocated gum for a 20-min period four times per day for 14 days. Each subject chewed all three test gums, with a 7-day washout period between crossovers. After each 14-day cycle, test and control half-slabs were paired, embedded in resin, sectioned, and subjected to microradiography to determine remineralization. Results: The gum TW produced significantly greater remineralization (18.4 +/- 0.9%) than Orbit (8.9 +/- 0.5%) and Orbit Professional (10.5 +/- 0.9%). Conclusion: The superior remineralization activity of the TW gum in situ was attributed to the presence of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate nanocomplexes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?