Analytical Modelling of Surface EMG Signals Generated by Curvilinear Fibers With Approximate Conductivity Tensor

Shihan Ma,Chen Chen,Jiamin Zhao,Dong Han,Xinjun Sheng,Dario Farina,Xiangyang Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2021.3112766
IF: 4.6
2022-03-01
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Abstract:Objective: Mathematical modelling of surface electromyographic (EMG) signals has been proven a valuable tool to interpret experimental data and to validate signal processing techniques. Most analytical EMG models only consider muscle fibers with specific arrangements. However, the fiber orientation may change along the fiber paths and differ from fiber to fiber. Here we propose a subject-specific EMG model that simulates the fiber trajectories in muscles of the upper arm and analytically derives the action potentials assuming an approximate conductivity tensor. Methods: Magnetic Resonance (MR) images were acquired to generate muscle fiber paths and to build the volume conductor. While the action potentials propagated along the identified curvilinear fibers, the conductivity tensor was approximated to be cylindrically anisotropic. Single fiber action potentials (SFAPs) were computed by simulating the generation, propagation, and extinction of membrane current sources. To validate the assumption of the approximate conductivity tensor, two numerical models with approximate or exact conductivity tensors were implemented. Results: The motor unit action potentials generated by the proposed analytical model and the two numerical models were highly similar (cross-correlation <span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="1.808ex" height="1.843ex" style="vertical-align: -0.338ex;" viewBox="0 -647.8 778.5 793.3" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMAIN-3E" x="0" y="0"></use></g></svg></span>0.98, normalized root mean square error, nRMSE <span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="2.846ex" height="2.509ex" style="vertical-align: -0.671ex;" viewBox="0 -791.3 1225.5 1080.4" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-6C" x="0" y="0"></use> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-65" x="298" y="0"></use> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-71" x="765" y="0"></use></g></svg></span> 0.04, relative error in the median frequency of the simulated waveforms of approximately 3%). The proposed analytical model was also evaluated by comparing simulated and experimentally recorded compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs). Finally, the proposed model was used to test the accuracy of an EMG decomposition algorithm, providing a realistic benchmark. Conclusions and Significance: The proposed anal-tical model generates action potentials that reflect the spatial distributions of muscle fibers with curvilinear paths.<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="display: none;"><defs id="MathJax_SVG_glyphs"><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMAIN-3E" d="M84 520Q84 528 88 533T96 539L99 540Q106 540 253 471T544 334L687 265Q694 260 694 250T687 235Q685 233 395 96L107 -40H101Q83 -38 83 -20Q83 -19 83 -17Q82 -10 98 -1Q117 9 248 71Q326 108 378 132L626 250L378 368Q90 504 86 509Q84 513 84 520Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-6C" d="M117 59Q117 26 142 26Q179 26 205 131Q211 151 215 152Q217 153 225 153H229Q238 153 241 153T246 151T248 144Q247 138 245 128T234 90T214 43T183 6T137 -11Q101 -11 70 11T38 85Q38 97 39 102L104 360Q167 615 167 623Q167 626 166 628T162 632T157 634T149 635T141 636T132 637T122 637Q112 637 109 637T101 638T95 641T94 647Q94 649 96 661Q101 680 107 682T179 688Q194 689 213 690T243 693T254 694Q266 694 266 686Q266 675 193 386T118 83Q118 81 118 75T117 65V59Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-65" d="M39 168Q39 225 58 272T107 350T174 402T244 433T307 442H310Q355 442 388 420T421 355Q421 265 310 237Q261 224 176 223Q139 223 138 221Q138 219 132 186T125 128Q125 81 146 54T209 26T302 45T394 111Q403 121 406 121Q410 121 419 112T429 98T420 82T390 55T344 24T281 -1T205 -11Q126 -11 83 42T39 168ZM373 353Q367 405 305 405Q272 405 244 391T199 357T170 316T154 280T149 261Q149 260 169 260Q282 260 327 284T373 353Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-71" d="M33 157Q33 258 109 349T280 441Q340 441 372 389Q373 390 377 395T388 406T404 418Q438 442 450 442Q454 442 457 439T460 434Q460 425 391 149Q320 -135 320 -139Q320 -147 365 -148H390Q396 -156 396 -157T393 -175Q389 -188 383 -194H370Q339 -192 262 -192Q234 -192 211 -192T174 -192T157 -193Q143 -193 143 -185Q143 -182 145 -170Q149 -154 152 -151T172 -148Q220 -148 230 -141Q238 -136 258 -53T279 32Q279 33 272 29Q224 -10 172 -10Q117 -10 75 30T33 157ZM352 326Q329 405 277 405Q242 405 210 374T160 293Q131 214 119 129Q119 126 119 118T118 106Q118 61 136 44T179 26Q233 26 290 98L298 109L352 326Z"></path></defs></svg>
engineering, biomedical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?