Abstract:The novel robot-assisted (RA) technique has been utilized increasingly to improve the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement. Although the clinical application of the RA technique has been investigated in several case series and comparative studies, the superiority and safety of RA over conventional freehand (FH) methods remain controversial. Meanwhile, the intra-pedicular accuracy of the two methods has not been compared for patients with cervical traumatic conditions. This study aimed to compare the rate and risk factors of intra-pedicular accuracy of RA versus the conventional FH approach for posterior pedicle screw placement in cervical traumatic diseases. A total of 52 patients with cervical traumatic diseases who received cervical screw placement using RA (26 patients) and FH (26 patients) techniques were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was the intra-pedicular accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement according to the Gertzbin–Robbins scale. Secondary outcome parameters included surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and complications. Moreover, the risk factors that possibly affected intra-pedicular accuracy were assessed using univariate analyses. Out of 52 screws inserted using the RA method, 43 screws (82.7%) were classified as grade A, with the remaining 7 (13.5%) and 2 (3.8%) screws classified as grades B and C. In the FH cohort, 60.8% of the 79 screws were graded A, with the remaining screws graded B (21, 26.6%), C (8, 10.1%), and D (2, 2.5%). The RA technique showed a significantly higher rate of optimal intra-pedicular accuracy than the FH method ( P = 0.008), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of clinically acceptable accuracy ( P = 0.161). Besides, the RA technique showed remarkably longer surgery time, less postoperative drainage, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and equivalent intraoperative blood loss and complications than the FH technique. Furthermore, the univariate analyses showed that severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane ( P = 0.003) and shorter width of the lateral mass at the inferior margin of the posterior arch ( P = 0.014) were risk factors related to the inaccuracy of C1 screw placement. The diagnosis of HRVA ( P < 0.001), severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane ( P < 0.001), short pedicle width ( P < 0.001), and short pedicle height ( P < 0.001) were risk factors related to the inaccuracy of C2 screw placement. RA cervical pedicle screw placement was associated with a higher rate of optimal intra-pedicular accuracy to the FH technique for patients with cervical traumatic conditions. The severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane independently contributed to high rates of the inaccuracy of C1 and C2 screw placements. RA pedicle screw placement is safe and useful for cervical traumatic surgery.

Comparison of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopically guided treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation in combination with high-riding vertebral artery: a preliminary study

One stage solution and posterior fusion surgery through the high anterior cervical retropharyngeal approach for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation

[Effectiveness comparison of robot-assisted and traditional freehand technology in treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation]

[Comparative study of computer-assisted and robot-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screw implantation for reversible atlantoaxial dislocation]

Deflective Placement of Anterior Odontoid Cannulated Screw for Treatment of Odontoid Fracture Combined with Atlantoaxial Posterior Dislocation

[Treatment Strategy of Rotatory Dislocation of Atlantoaxial Articulation in Children].

[Comparison of the accuracy and safety of robot-and navigation-assisted screw placement in atlantoaxial dislocation surgery]

Clinical Outcomes of Atlantoaxial Dislocation Combined with High-Riding Vertebral Artery Using C2 Translaminar Screws

Improving C1 Pedicle Screw Placement for Atlantoaxial Instability with Ultrasonic Bone Burr Assistance

Single-stage Anterior Release and Sequential Posterior Fusion for Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation

The development of posterior reduction forceps for atlantoaxial dislocation and its preliminary application in irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation

Advances in surgical treatment for atlantoaxial instability focusing on rheumatoid arthritis: Analysis of a series of 67 patients

Preliminary Clinical Application of Anterior Anatomical Reduction Plate Fixation for Atlantoaxial Dislocation

Retropharyngeal Reduction Plate for Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Cadaveric Test and Morphometric Trajectory Analysis

Novel surgical classification and treatment strategy for atlantoaxial dislocations.

Surgical Management of Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation

Posterior Realignment of Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation with Atlantoaxial Pedicle Screw-rod Fixation

Clinical application of spinal robot in cervical spine surgery: safety and accuracy of posterior pedicle screw placement in comparison with conventional freehand methods

A review of the diagnosis and treatment of atlantoaxial dislocations.

Treatment of atlantoaxial dislocations among patients with cervical osseous or vascular abnormalities utilizing hybrid techniques.

Management of pediatric patients with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: transoral anterior release, reduction, and fixation