Development of a Detailed Kinetic Model for Hydrogen Oxidation in Supercritical H 2 O/CO 2 Mixtures
Guoxing Li,Youjun Lu,Peter Glarborg
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01914
2020-08-07
Abstract:The application of hydrogen as a fuel or auxiliary fuel has extended beyond gas-phase conditions. This paper reports the development of a detailed chemical kinetic model for hydrogen oxidation in supercritical H<sub>2</sub>O/CO<sub>2</sub> mixtures based on an existing gas-phase model. Revisions were made to thermodynamic properties and elementary reactions to account for the supercritical conditions. The effect of supercritical water (SCW) on selected elementary reactions was taken into consideration. The model for SCW oxidation of hydrogen was evaluated against experimental data in the literature. The model was able to reproduce satisfactorily the experimental results. The observed discrepancies were largely attributed to experimental artifacts, mainly deviation from an ideal plug flow. Key elementary reactions were identified by sensitivity analysis, and details of the oxidation mechanism were inferred by analyzing reaction paths. Finally, effects of the pressure and CO<sub>2</sub> concentration on the model predictions were discussed.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01914?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01914</a>.Comparison of the performance of different gas-phase models to experimental data<a class="ref ref6" href="">(6)</a> under stoichiometric conditions at 505, 551, and 599 °C (Figure S1), comparison of true densities of SCW to the values calculated by different models at 23.6 and 27 MPa (Figure S2), comparison of polynomial fitting results of enthalpy (<i>H</i>) and specific heat capacity (<i>C</i><sub>p</sub>) to the values obtained from the NIST database at 23.6 MPa (Figure S3), comparison of the reaction rates of H + H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> = HO<sub>2</sub> + H<sub>2</sub> reported in different literature (Figure S4), hydrogen conversion predicted by the model and obtained by experiments (Figure S5), comparison of measured<a class="ref ref10 ref11" href="">(10,11)</a> and predicted hydrogen conversion as a function of the residence time (Figure S6), comparison of measured<a class="ref ref12" href="">(12)</a> and predicted hydrogen conversion as a function of the residence time at different temperatures (Figure S7), comparison of measured<a class="ref ref6" href="">(6)</a> and predicted hydrogen conversion as a function of the residence time under different conditions (Figure S8), comparison of the reaction rates of 2HO<sub>2</sub> = H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> + O<sub>2</sub> reported in different literature (Figure S9), comparison of the reaction rates of OH + H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> = HO<sub>2</sub> + H<sub>2</sub>O reported in different literature (Figure S10), comparison of the reaction rates of OH + HO<sub>2</sub> = O<sub>2</sub> + H<sub>2</sub>O reported in different literature (Figure S11), detailed updated H<sub>2</sub>/O<sub>2</sub> reaction mechanism (Table S1), parameters of PR equation of state for different species (Table S2), and fitting polynomial coefficients of different species upon different temperature ranges (Table S3) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01914/suppl_file/ef0c01914_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)H<sub>2</sub> kinetic mechanism (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01914/suppl_file/ef0c01914_si_002.pdf">PDF</a>)Thermodynamic properties (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01914/suppl_file/ef0c01914_si_003.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
energy & fuels,engineering, chemical