Abstract:In 1943, Hadwiger conjectured that every graph with no K t K_t minor is ( t − 1 ) (t-1) -colorable for every t ≥ 1 t\ge 1 . In the 1980s, Kostochka and Thomason independently proved that every graph with no K t K_t minor has average degree O ( t log ⁡ t ) O(t\sqrt {\log t}) and hence is O ( t log ⁡ t ) O(t\sqrt {\log t}) -colorable. Recently, Norin, Song and the second author showed that every graph with no K t K_t minor is O ( t ( log ⁡ t ) β ) O(t(\log t)^{\beta }) -colorable for every β > 1 / 4 \beta > 1/4 , making the first improvement on the order of magnitude of the O ( t log ⁡ t ) O(t\sqrt {\log t}) bound. The first main result of this paper is that every graph with no K t K_t minor is O ( t log ⁡ log ⁡ t ) O(t\log \log t) -colorable. This is actually a corollary of our main technical result that the chromatic number of a K t K_t -minor-free graph is bounded by O ( t ( 1 + f ( G , t ) ) ) O(t(1+f(G,t))) where f ( G , t ) f(G,t) is the maximum of χ ( H ) a \frac {\chi (H)}{a} over all a ≥ t log ⁡ t a\ge \frac {t}{\sqrt {\log t}} and K a K_a -minor-free subgraphs H H of G G that are small (i.e. O ( a log 4 ⁡ a ) O(a\log ^4 a) vertices). This has a number of interesting corollaries. First as mentioned, using the current best-known bounds on coloring small K t K_t -minor-free graphs, we show that K t K_t -minor-free graphs are O ( t log ⁡ log ⁡ t ) O(t\log \log t) -colorable. Second, it shows that proving Linear Hadwiger’s Conjecture (that K t K_t -minor-free graphs are O ( t ) O(t) -colorable) reduces to proving it for small graphs. Third, we prove that K t K_t -minor-free graphs with clique number at most log ⁡ t / ( log ⁡ log ⁡ t ) 2 \sqrt {\log t}/ (\log \log t)^2 are O ( t ) O(t) -colorable. This implies our final corollary that Linear Hadwiger’s Conjecture holds for K r K_r -free graphs for every fixed r r ; more generally, we show there exists C ≥ 1 C\ge 1 such that for every r ≥ 1 r\ge 1 , there exists t r t_r such that for all t ≥ t r t\ge t_r , every K r K_r -free K t K_t -minor-free graph is C t Ct -colorable. One key to proving the main theorem is building the minor in two new ways according to whether the chromatic number ‘separates’ in the graph: sequentially if the graph is the chromatic-inseparable and recursively if the graph is chromatic-separable. The other key is a new standalone result that every K t K_t -minor-free graph of average degree d = Ω ( t ) d=\Omega (t) has a subgraph on O ( t log 3 ⁡ t ) O(t \log ^3 t) vertices with average degree Ω ( d ) \Omega (d) .

When removing an independent set is optimal for reducing the chromatic number

An Extension of the Win Theorem: Counting the Number of Maximum Independent Sets

Reducing Linear Hadwiger's Conjecture to Coloring Small Graphs

Reducing linear Hadwiger’s conjecture to coloring small graphs

Finding Optimal Solutions with Neighborly Help

Improvement on Brook theorem for (3 Times K1)-free Graphs

On Reducible Partition of Graphs

Minimum non-chromatic-choosable graphs with given chromatic number

Inclusion chromatic index of random graphs

Brooks' Theorem and Beyond

Highly Connected Subgraphs with Large Chromatic Number

Distinguishing colorings, proper colorings, and covering properties without the Axiom of Choice

Single-conflict colouring

Common graphs with arbitrary chromatic number

Some extremal results on the chromatic-stability index

A note on the alternating number of independent sets in a graph

Brooks-type theorems for relaxations of square colorings

Tight Bounds on the Chromatic Edge Stability Index of Graphs

Brooks' theorem with forbidden colors

A note on the conflict-free chromatic index