Abstract:An implicit ambiguity in the field of prediction-based decision-making regards the relation between the concepts of prediction and decision. Much of the literature in the field tends to blur the boundaries between the two concepts and often simply speaks of 'fair prediction.' In this paper, we point out that a differentiation of these concepts is helpful when implementing algorithmic fairness. Even if fairness properties are related to the features of the used prediction model, what is more properly called 'fair' or 'unfair' is a decision system, not a prediction model. This is because fairness is about the consequences on human lives, created by a decision, not by a prediction. We clarify the distinction between the concepts of prediction and decision and show the different ways in which these two elements influence the final fairness properties of a prediction-based decision system. In addition to exploring this relationship conceptually and practically, we propose a framework that enables a better understanding and reasoning of the conceptual logic of creating fairness in prediction-based decision-making. In our framework, we specify different roles, namely the 'prediction-modeler' and the 'decision-maker,' and the information required from each of them for being able to implement fairness of the system. Our framework allows for deriving distinct responsibilities for both roles and discussing some insights related to ethical and legal requirements. Our contribution is twofold. First, we shift the focus from abstract algorithmic fairness to context-dependent decision-making, recognizing diverse actors with unique objectives and independent actions. Second, we provide a conceptual framework that can help structure prediction-based decision problems with respect to fairness issues, identify responsibilities, and implement fairness governance mechanisms in real-world scenarios.

Prediction-Based Decisions and Fairness: A Catalogue of Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions

Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions

On Prediction-Modelers and Decision-Makers: Why Fairness Requires More Than a Fair Prediction Model

On Formalizing Fairness in Prediction with Machine Learning

Group Fairness in Prediction-Based Decision Making: From Moral Assessment to Implementation

What Is Fairness? On the Role of Protected Attributes and Fictitious Worlds

Learning to be Fair: A Consequentialist Approach to Equitable Decision-Making

On the Fairness of Machine-Assisted Human Decisions

From fair predictions to just decisions? Conceptualizing algorithmic fairness and distributive justice in the context of data-driven decision-making

Survey on Fairness Notions and Related Tensions

Fairness issues, current approaches, and challenges in machine learning models

The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairness

What-is and How-to for Fairness in Machine Learning: A Survey, Reflection, and Perspective

Mathematical Notions vs. Human Perception of Fairness: A Descriptive Approach to Fairness for Machine Learning

Beyond Incompatibility: Trade-offs between Mutually Exclusive Fairness Criteria in Machine Learning and Law

FairlyUncertain: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Uncertainty in Algorithmic Fairness

A Review on Fairness in Machine Learning

The Flawed Foundations of Fair Machine Learning

Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy

A Review of Fairness and A Practical Guide to Selecting Context-Appropriate Fairness Metrics in Machine Learning

Human Perceptions of Fairness in Algorithmic Decision Making: A Case Study of Criminal Risk Prediction