How Many Subpopulations is Too Many? Exponential Lower Bounds for Inferring Population Histories

Younhun Kim,Frederic Koehler,Ankur Moitra,Elchanan Mossel,Govind Ramnarayan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.03177
2019-05-08
Abstract:Reconstruction of population histories is a central problem in population genetics. Existing coalescent-based methods, like the seminal work of Li and Durbin (Nature, 2011), attempt to solve this problem using sequence data but have no rigorous guarantees. Determining the amount of data needed to correctly reconstruct population histories is a major challenge. Using a variety of tools from information theory, the theory of extremal polynomials, and approximation theory, we prove new sharp information-theoretic lower bounds on the problem of reconstructing population structure -- the history of multiple subpopulations that merge, split and change sizes over time. Our lower bounds are exponential in the number of subpopulations, even when reconstructing recent histories. We demonstrate the sharpness of our lower bounds by providing algorithms for distinguishing and learning population histories with matching dependence on the number of subpopulations. Along the way and of independent interest, we essentially determine the optimal number of samples needed to learn an exponential mixture distribution information-theoretically, proving the upper bound by analyzing natural (and efficient) algorithms for this problem.
Populations and Evolution,Statistics Theory,Quantitative Methods
What problem does this paper attempt to address?