Is Blockchain Hashing an Effective Method for Electronic Governance?

Oleksii Konashevych,Marta Poblet
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.08783
2018-10-20
Abstract:Governments across the world are testing different uses of the blockchain for the delivery of their public services. Blockchain hashing - or the insertion of data in the blockchain - is one of the potential applications of the blockchain in this space. With this method, users can apply special scripts to add their data to blockchain transactions, ensuring both immutability and publicity. Blockchain hashing also secures the integrity of the original data stored on central governmental databases. The paper starts by analysing possible scenarios of hashing on the blockchain and assesses in which cases it may work and in which it is less likely to add value to a public administration. Second, the paper also compares this method with traditional digital signatures using PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) and discusses standardisation in each domain. Third, it also addresses issues related to concepts such as distributed ledger technology and permissioned blockchains. Finally, it raises the question of whether blockchain hashing is an effective solution for electronic governance, and concludes that its value is controversial, even if it is improved by PKI and other security measures. In this regard, we claim that governments need first to identify pain points in governance, and then consider the trade-offs of the blockchain as a potential solution versus other alternatives.
Computers and Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to explore the effectiveness and applicability of blockchain hash technology in e - governance. Specifically, the author analyzes the application potential of blockchain hash in different scenarios and evaluates the possible value it may bring in public management. The paper also compares the differences between blockchain hash and traditional digital signature technologies (such as PKI), discusses the standardization issue, and proposes that before using blockchain technology for e - governance, the government should first identify the pain points in the governance process and consider the trade - offs between blockchain and other alternatives. The main research questions of the paper can be summarized as follows: 1. **Effectiveness of blockchain hash technology in e - governance**: Explore whether blockchain hash can effectively improve the integrity and transparency of public data. 2. **Comparison with traditional digital signature technology**: Analyze the similarities and differences between blockchain hash and traditional digital signatures (such as PKI) in terms of security, standardization, and implementation difficulty. 3. **Lack of standardization and regulatory framework**: Discuss the impact of the current lack of unified standards and regulatory frameworks on the application of blockchain technology in public management. 4. **Actual application cases of blockchain technology in public management**: Evaluate the actual effects and potential problems of blockchain technology by analyzing pilot projects in different countries and regions. Finally, the paper concludes that although blockchain hash technology has certain potential, in the current situation of lacking standardization and regulatory frameworks, its application in e - governance is still controversial. Therefore, before considering the adoption of blockchain technology, the government needs to clarify the key issues in the governance process first and comprehensively evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of various technical solutions.