DefunT: A Tool for Automating Termination Proofs by Using the Community Books (Extended Abstract)

Matt Kaufmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.280.12

2018-10-10

Abstract:We present a tool that automates termination proofs for recursive definitions by mining existing termination theorems.

Logic in Computer Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Automated Termination Proofs for C Programs with Lists (Short WST Version)

Jera Hensel,Jürgen Giesl

2023-07-21

Abstract:There are many techniques and tools for termination of C programs, but up to now they were not very powerful for termination proofs of programs whose termination depends on recursive data structures like lists. We present the first approach that extends powerful techniques for termination analysis of C programs (with memory allocation and explicit pointer arithmetic) to lists.

Logic in Computer Science
Automated Termination Proofs with AProVE

Jürgen Giesl,René Thiemann,Peter Schneider-Kamp,Stephan Falke

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25979-4_15

2004-01-01

Abstract:We describe the system ProVE, an automated prover to verify (innermost) termination of term rewrite systems (TRSs). For this system, we have developed and implemented efficient algorithms based on classical simplification orders, dependency pairs, and the size-change principle. In particular, it contains many new improvements of the dependency pair approach that make automated termination proving more powerful and efficient. In ProVE, termination proofs can be performed with a user-friendly graphical interface and the system is currently among the most powerful termination provers available.
Proving Termination with AProVE

Stephan Falke,René Thiemann,J. Giesl,Peter Schneider-Kamp

Abstract:The system AProVE (Automated Program Verification Environment) offers a variety of techniques for automated (innermost) termination proofs of (possibly conditional) TRSs, logic programs, and first-order functional programs. Besides efficient implementations of classical simplification orders (Sect. 2), it offers the dependency pair technique [2,11] which allows the application of classical orders to examples where they would fail otherwise (Sect. 3). In contrast to most other implementations, we integrated numerous refinements such as narrowing, rewriting, and instantiation of dependency pairs [2,10,12,13], recent improvements to reduce the constraints generated by the dependency pair technique [12,13,23], etc. Therefore, AProVE succeeds on many examples where other currently available systems for automated termination proofs fail. AProVE also features the size-change principle [20] and it is possible to combine this principle with dependency pairs [22]. The tool is written in Java and proofs can be performed both in a fully automated or in an interactive mode via a graphical user interface. Sect. 4 compares AProVE with related tools.

Computer Science
Analyzing Program Termination and Complexity Automatically with AProVE

Jürgen Giesl,Cornelius Aschermann,Marc Brockschmidt,Fabian Emmes,Florian Frohn,Carsten Fuhs,Jera Hensel,Carsten Otto,Martin Plücker,Peter Schneider-Kamp,Thomas Ströder,Stephanie Swiderski,René Thiemann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-016-9388-y

2016-10-21

Journal of Automated Reasoning

Abstract:In this system description, we present the tool AProVE for automatic termination and complexity proofs of Java, C, Haskell, Prolog, and rewrite systems. In addition to classical term rewrite systems (TRSs), AProVE also supports rewrite systems containing built-in integers (int-TRSs). To analyze programs in high-level languages, AProVE automatically converts them to (int-)TRSs. Then, a wide range of techniques is employed to prove termination and to infer complexity bounds for the resulting rewrite systems. The generated proofs can be exported to check their correctness using automatic certifiers. To use AProVE in software construction, we present a corresponding plug-in for the popular Eclipse software development environment.

computer science, artificial intelligence
Proving Termination of Programs Automatically with AProVE

Jürgen Giesl,Marc Brockschmidt,Fabian Emmes,Florian Frohn,Carsten Fuhs,Carsten Otto,Martin Plücker,Peter Schneider-Kamp,Thomas Ströder,Stephanie Swiderski,René Thiemann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08587-6_13

2014-01-01

Abstract:AProVE is a system for automatic termination and complexity proofs of Java, C, Haskell, Prolog, and term rewrite systems (TRSs). To analyze programs in high-level languages, AProVE automatically converts them to TRSs. Then, a wide range of techniques is employed to prove termination and to infer complexity bounds for the resulting TRSs. The generated proofs can be exported to check their correctness using automatic certifiers. For use in software construction, we present an AProVE plug-in for the popular Eclipse software development environment.
A Versatile, Sound Tool for Simplifying Definitions

Alessandro Coglio,Matt Kaufmann,Eric W. Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.249.5

2017-05-03

Abstract:We present a tool, simplify-defun, that transforms the definition of a given function into a simplified definition of a new function, providing a proof checked by ACL2 that the old and new functions are equivalent. When appropriate it also generates termination and guard proofs for the new function. We explain how the tool is engineered so that these proofs will succeed. Examples illustrate its utility, in particular for program transformation in synthesis and verification.

Programming Languages,Artificial Intelligence
The Probabilistic Termination Tool Amber

Marcel Moosbrugger,Ezio Bartocci,Joost-Pieter Katoen,Laura Kovács

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.13072

2021-07-28

Abstract:We describe the Amber tool for proving and refuting the termination of a class of probabilistic while-programs with polynomial arithmetic, in a fully automated manner. Amber combines martingale theory with properties of asymptotic bounding functions and implements relaxed versions of existing probabilistic termination proof rules to prove/disprove (positive) almost sure termination of probabilistic loops. Amber supports programs parameterized by symbolic constants and drawing from common probability distributions. Our experimental comparisons give practical evidence of Amber outperforming existing state-of-the-art tools.

Programming Languages
Certification extends Termination Techniques

Christian Sternagel,René Thiemann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1208.1594

2012-08-08

Abstract:There are termination proofs that are produced by termination tools for which certifiers are not powerful enough. However, a similar situation also occurs in the other direction. We have formalized termination techniques in a more general setting as they have been introduced. Hence, we can certify proofs using techniques that no termination tool supports so far. In this paper we shortly present two of these formalizations: Polynomial orders with negative constants and Arctic termination.

Logic in Computer Science
Automated Termination Proofs for Logic Programs by Term Rewriting

P. Schneider-Kamp,J. Giesl,A. Serebrenik,R. Thiemann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0803.0014

2008-09-01

Abstract:There are two kinds of approaches for termination analysis of logic programs: "transformational" and "direct" ones. Direct approaches prove termination directly on the basis of the logic program. Transformational approaches transform a logic program into a term rewrite system (TRS) and then analyze termination of the resulting TRS instead. Thus, transformational approaches make all methods previously developed for TRSs available for logic programs as well. However, the applicability of most existing transformations is quite restricted, as they can only be used for certain subclasses of logic programs. (Most of them are restricted to well-moded programs.) In this paper we improve these transformations such that they become applicable for any definite logic program. To simulate the behavior of logic programs by TRSs, we slightly modify the notion of rewriting by permitting infinite terms. We show that our transformation results in TRSs which are indeed suitable for automated termination analysis. In contrast to most other methods for termination of logic programs, our technique is also sound for logic programming without occur check, which is typically used in practice. We implemented our approach in the termination prover AProVE and successfully evaluated it on a large collection of examples.

Logic in Computer Science,Artificial Intelligence,Programming Languages
TTT2 with Termination Templates for Teaching

Jonas Schöpf,Christian Sternagel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1806.05040

2018-06-13

Logic in Computer Science

Abstract:On the one hand, checking specific termination proofs by hand, say using a particular collection of matrix interpretations, can be an arduous and error-prone task. On the other hand, automation of such checks would save time and help to establish correctness of exam solutions, examples in lecture notes etc. To this end, we introduce a template mechanism for the termination tool TTT2 that allows us to restrict parameters of certain termination methods. In the extreme, when all parameters are fixed, such restrictions result in checks for specific proofs.
Synthesising Interprocedural Bit-Precise Termination Proofs (T).

Hong-Yi Chen,Cristina David,Daniel Kroening,Peter Schrammel,Bjorn Wachter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ase.2015.10

2015-01-01

Abstract:Proving program termination is key to guaranteeing absence of undesirable behaviour, such as hanging programs and even security vulnerabilities such as denial-of-service attacks. To make termination checks scale to large systems, interprocedural termination analysis seems essential, which is a largely unexplored area of research in termination analysis, where most effort has focussed on difficult single-procedure problems. We present a modular termination analysis for C programs using template-based interprocedural summarisation. Our analysis combines a context-sensitive, over-approximating forward analysis with the inference of under-approximating preconditions for termination. Bit-precise termination arguments are synthesised over lexicographic linear ranking function templates. Our experimental results show that our tool 2LS outperforms state-of-the-art alternatives, and demonstrate the clear advantage of interprocedural reasoning over monolithic analysis in terms of efficiency, while retaining comparable precision.
Automated Termination Analysis for Logic Programs with Cut

Peter Schneider-Kamp,Jürgen Giesl,Thomas Ströder,Alexander Serebrenik,René Thiemann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1007.4908

2010-07-28

Logic in Computer Science

Abstract:Termination is an important and well-studied property for logic programs. However, almost all approaches for automated termination analysis focus on definite logic programs, whereas real-world Prolog programs typically use the cut operator. We introduce a novel pre-processing method which automatically transforms Prolog programs into logic programs without cuts, where termination of the cut-free program implies termination of the original program. Hence after this pre-processing, any technique for proving termination of definite logic programs can be applied. We implemented this pre-processing in our termination prover AProVE and evaluated it successfully with extensive experiments.
Proving Termination of C Programs with Lists

Jera Hensel,Jürgen Giesl

2023-06-03

Abstract:There are many techniques and tools to prove termination of C programs, but up to now these tools were not very powerful for fully automated termination proofs of programs whose termination depends on recursive data structures like lists. We present the first approach that extends powerful techniques for termination analysis of C programs (with memory allocation and explicit pointer arithmetic) to lists.

Logic in Computer Science
Proving and Disproving Programs with Shared Mutable Data

Georg Schmid,Viktor Kunčak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.07699

2021-03-13

Abstract:We present a tool for verification of deterministic programs with shared mutable references against specifications such as assertions, preconditions, postconditions, and read/write effects. We implement our tool by encoding programs with mutable references into annotated purely functional recursive programs. We then rely on function unfolding and the SMT solver Z3 to prove or disprove safety and to establish program termination. Our tool uses a new translation of programs where frame conditions are encoded using quantifier-free formulas in first-order logic (instead of relying on quantifiers or separation logic). This quantifier-free encoding enables SMT solvers to prove safety or report counterexamples relative to the semantics of procedure specifications. Our encoding is possible thanks to the expressive power of the extended array theory of the Z3 SMT solver. In addition to the ability to report counterexamples, our tool retains efficiency of reasoning about purely functional layers of data structures, providing expressiveness for mutable data but also a significant level of automation for purely functional aspects of software. We illustrate our tool through examples manipulating mutable linked structures and arrays.

Logic in Computer Science
DynamiTe: Dynamic Termination and Non-termination Proofs

Ton Chanh Le,Timos Antonopoulos,Parisa Fathololumi,Eric Koskinen,ThanhVu Nguyen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.05747

2020-10-12

Abstract:There is growing interest in termination reasoning for non-linear programs and, meanwhile, recent dynamic strategies have shown they are able to infer invariants for such challenging programs. These advances led us to hypothesize that perhaps such dynamic strategies for non-linear invariants could be adapted to learn recurrent sets (for non-termination) and/or ranking functions (for termination). In this paper, we exploit dynamic analysis and draw termination and non-termination as well as static and dynamic strategies closer together in order to tackle non-linear programs. For termination, our algorithm infers ranking functions from concrete transitive closures, and, for non-termination, the algorithm iteratively collects executions and dynamically learns conditions to refine recurrent sets. Finally, we describe an integrated algorithm that allows these algorithms to mutually inform each other, taking counterexamples from a failed validation in one endeavor and crossing both the static/dynamic and termination/non-termination lines, to create new execution samples for the other one.

Programming Languages
Sound and Complete Proof Rules for Probabilistic Termination

Rupak Majumdar,V.R. Sathiyanarayana

2024-07-24

Abstract:Deciding termination is a fundamental problem in the analysis of probabilistic imperative programs. We consider the qualitative and quantitative probabilistic termination problems for an imperative programming model with discrete probabilistic choice and demonic bounded nondeterminism. The qualitative question asks if the program terminates almost-surely, no matter how nondeterminism is resolved. The quantitative question asks for a bound on the probability of termination. Despite a long and rich literature on the topic, no sound and relatively complete proof systems were known for these problems. In this paper, we provide such sound and relatively complete proof rules for proving qualitative and quantitative termination in the assertion language of arithmetic. Our rules use supermartingales as estimates of the likelihood of a program's evolution and variants as measures of distances to termination. Our key insight is our completeness result, which shows how to construct a suitable supermartingales from an almost-surely terminating program. We also show that proofs of termination in many existing proof systems can be transformed to proofs in our system, pointing to its applicability in practice. As an application of our proof rule, we show an explicit proof of almost-sure termination for the two-dimensional random walker.

Logic in Computer Science
Verifying Programs Using Abstraction and Theorem Proving.

Junyan Qian,Baowen Xu

2007-01-01

Abstract:we present a methodology for automatically verifying programs against safety specifications based on finite state machine. Firstly, computing the abstract transition between abstract states is done by calling a theorem prover, and then an initial abstract model automatically is extracted from concrete program using predicate abstraction. However, the process of abstraction can be exponential in the number of predicates used. Program slicing, predicate inference and partitioning the set of candidate predicates into subsets make abstract model construction effective. By counterexample-guided abstraction refinement scheme, the abstraction refines incrementally until the specification is either satisfied or refuted. Finally, our methods can be extended to verifying concurrency programs by parallel composition.
CeTA - A Tool for Certified Termination Analysis

Christian Sternagel,René Thiemann,Sarah Winkler,Harald Zankl

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1208.1591

2012-08-08

Abstract:Since the first termination competition in 2004 it is of great interest, whether a proof that has been automatically generated by a termination tool, is indeed correct. The increasing number of termination proving techniques as well as the increasing complexity of generated proofs (e.g., combinations of several techniques, exhaustive labelings, tree automata, etc.), make certifying (i.e., checking the correctness of) such proofs more and more tedious for humans. Hence the interest in automated certification of termination proofs. This led to the general approach of using proof assistants (like Coq and Isabelle) for certification. We present the latest developments for IsaFoR/CeTA (version 1.03) which is the certifier CeTA, based on the Isabelle/HOL formalization of rewriting IsaFoR.

Logic in Computer Science
Automated Termination Analysis of Polynomial Probabilistic Programs

Marcel Moosbrugger,Ezio Bartocci,Joost-Pieter Katoen,Laura Kovács

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.03444

2021-01-29

Abstract:The termination behavior of probabilistic programs depends on the outcomes of random assignments. Almost sure termination (AST) is concerned with the question whether a program terminates with probability one on all possible inputs. Positive almost sure termination (PAST) focuses on termination in a finite expected number of steps. This paper presents a fully automated approach to the termination analysis of probabilistic while-programs whose guards and expressions are polynomial expressions. As proving (positive) AST is undecidable in general, existing proof rules typically provide sufficient conditions. These conditions mostly involve constraints on supermartingales. We consider four proof rules from the literature and extend these with generalizations of existing proof rules for (P)AST. We automate the resulting set of proof rules by effectively computing asymptotic bounds on polynomials over the program variables. These bounds are used to decide the sufficient conditions - including the constraints on supermartingales - of a proof rule. Our software tool Amber can thus check AST, PAST, as well as their negations for a large class of polynomial probabilistic programs, while carrying out the termination reasoning fully with polynomial witnesses. Experimental results show the merits of our generalized proof rules and demonstrate that Amber can handle probabilistic programs that are out of reach for other state-of-the-art tools.

Programming Languages
Specification and Verification with the TLA+ Trifecta: TLC, Apalache, and TLAPS

Igor Konnov,Markus Kuppe,Stephan Merz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.07216

2022-11-14

Logic in Computer Science

Abstract:Using an algorithm due to Safra for distributed termination detection as a running example, we present the main tools for verifying specifications written in TLA+. Examining their complementary strengths and weaknesses, we suggest a workflow that supports different types of analysis and that can be adapted to the desired degree of confidence.

DefunT: A Tool for Automating Termination Proofs by Using the Community Books (Extended Abstract)

Automated Termination Proofs for C Programs with Lists (Short WST Version)

Automated Termination Proofs with AProVE

Proving Termination with AProVE

Analyzing Program Termination and Complexity Automatically with AProVE

Proving Termination of Programs Automatically with AProVE

A Versatile, Sound Tool for Simplifying Definitions

The Probabilistic Termination Tool Amber

Certification extends Termination Techniques

Automated Termination Proofs for Logic Programs by Term Rewriting

TTT2 with Termination Templates for Teaching

Synthesising Interprocedural Bit-Precise Termination Proofs (T).

Automated Termination Analysis for Logic Programs with Cut

Proving Termination of C Programs with Lists

Proving and Disproving Programs with Shared Mutable Data

DynamiTe: Dynamic Termination and Non-termination Proofs

Sound and Complete Proof Rules for Probabilistic Termination

Verifying Programs Using Abstraction and Theorem Proving.

CeTA - A Tool for Certified Termination Analysis

Automated Termination Analysis of Polynomial Probabilistic Programs

Specification and Verification with the TLA+ Trifecta: TLC, Apalache, and TLAPS