Abstract:A neural language model can be conditioned into generating descriptions for images by providing visual information apart from the sentence prefix. This visual information can be included into the language model through different points of entry resulting in different neural architectures. We identify four main architectures which we call init-inject, pre-inject, par-inject, and merge. We analyse these four architectures and conclude that the best performing one is init-inject, which is when the visual information is injected into the initial state of the recurrent neural network. We confirm this using both automatic evaluation measures and human annotation. We then analyse how much influence the images have on each architecture. This is done by measuring how different the output probabilities of a model are when a partial sentence is combined with a completely different image from the one it is meant to be combined with. We find that init-inject tends to quickly become less influenced by the image as more words are generated. A different architecture called merge, which is when the visual information is merged with the recurrent neural network's hidden state vector prior to output, loses visual influence much more slowly, suggesting that it would work better for generating longer sentences. We also observe that the merge architecture can have its recurrent neural network pre-trained in a text-only language model (transfer learning) rather than be initialised randomly as usual. This results in even better performance than the other architectures, provided that the source language model is not too good at language modelling or it will overspecialise and be less effective at image description generation. Our work opens up new avenues of research in neural architectures, explainable AI, and transfer learning.

Quantifying the amount of visual information used by neural caption generators

Visualizing and Understanding Neural Models in NLP

See or Guess: Counterfactually Regularized Image Captioning

From Captions to Visual Concepts and Back

Towards Unique and Informative Captioning of Images

Oracle performance for visual captioning

Precision or Recall? An Analysis of Image Captions for Training Text-to-Image Generation Model

Imageability- and Length-Controllable Image Captioning

On Architectures for Including Visual Information in Neural Language Models for Image Description

Quantization Effects on Neural Networks Perception: How would quantization change the perceptual field of vision models?

How many words is a picture worth? Automatic caption generation for news images

Image Captioners Sometimes Tell More Than Images They See

Automatic Caption Generation for News Images

Adaptively Attending to Visual Attributes and Linguistic Knowledge for Captioning

Visuals to Text: A Comprehensive Review on Automatic Image Captioning

Image Captioning Algorithm Based on Sufficient Visual Information and Text Information

A Large-Scale Multilingual Study of Visual Constraints on Linguistic Selection of Descriptions

A comprehensive review of image caption generation

Image Captioning using Facial Expression and Attention

Top-down Visual Saliency Guided by Captions

All You May Need for VQA are Image Captions