Abstract:Abstract Phylogenies inferred using both concatenation- and coalescent-based analyses typically render highly congruent trees. However, when they disagree, they often differ with respect to historically contentious and evolutionarily important relationships. These relationships may also involve etiolated lineages where increased sampling is not possible. Recently, methods aimed at interrogating single relationships or trees have emerged as promising investigative tools to examine these cases. Although recent methods such as “Edge-based Phylogenomic Support analYsis” (EPSY) led to insights into both systematic error and real biological signal, whether they are consistent with the coalescent in cases with high Incomplete Lineage Sorting (ILS) has yet to be characterized. Here, we use simulations and an empirical dataset to test the performance of EPSY, concatenation, and coalescent-based summary analyses under high levels of ILS. We focused on high-ILS scenarios because these represent the typical difficult cases that researchers often face due to the prevalence of ILS in phylogenomic datasets. ILS is known to be a major cause of phylogenomic conflict, which confounds many biological conclusions that depend on a resolved phylogeny, such as inferring ancestral character states, biogeographic reconstructions, and domestication histories. Our study found that EPSY was consistent with the coalescent in a high-ILS empirical dataset. In high-ILS simulations EPSY infers the correct edge more than half the time, whereas coalescent based methods and concatenation methods inferred the actual tree 37.8% and 25% of the time, respectively. All methods have conditions under which they generate the most accurate inferences. Given the levels of ILS in simulations, 26.2% of the time no method recovered the true tree. This zone where no current method can infer the true topology is likely due to properties of the species tree, such as the length of internal edges adjacent to a conflict and/or the length of the shortest branch. Nevertheless, the EPSY approach proves to be a valuable complement to phylogenomic analyses for interrogating regions of the tree with conflicting hypotheses generated from past studies or alternative inference methods. Our analyses highlight that robust phylogenetic trees may not be possible under some scenarios regardless of method and data source.

Impossibility results on stability of phylogenetic consensus methods

A survey of the monotonicity and non-contradiction of consensus methods and supertree methods

Consistency of Bayesian inference of resolved phylogenetic trees

Properties of Consensus Methods for Inferring Species Trees from Gene Trees

When species trees disagree: an approach consistent with the coalescent that quantifies phylogenomic support for contentious relationships

A consistency lemma in statistical phylogenetics

Topological Characterization of Stabilizing Consensus

Phylogenetic consensus networks: Computing a consensus of 1-nested phylogenetic networks

Impossibility of phylogeny reconstruction from $k$-mer counts

The meaning and measure of concordance factors in phylogenomics

The standard lateral gene transfer model is statistically consistent for pectinate four-taxon trees

Phylogenetic tree instability after taxon addition: empirical frequency, predictability, and consequences for online inference

Evolutionary Origin of Asymptotically Stable Consensus

The Efficacy of Consensus Tree Methods for Summarizing Phylogenetic Relationships from a Posterior Sample of Trees Estimated from Morphological Data

Impact of phylogeny on structural contact inference from protein sequence data

Point estimates in phylogenetic reconstructions

Evolutionary Trees and the Ising Model on the Bethe Lattice: a Proof of Steel's Conjecture

Enumeration of binary trees compatible with a perfect phylogeny

Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies

On the importance of assessing topological convergence in Bayesian phylogenetic inference

Inferring multiple consensus trees and supertrees using clustering: a review