Abstract:The number of discovered exoplanets now exceeds 5500, allowing statistical analyses of planetary systems. Multi-planet systems are mini-laboratories of planet formation and evolution, and analysing their system architectures can help us to constrain the physics of these processes. Recent works have found evidence of significant intrasystem uniformity in planet properties such as radius, mass, and orbital spacing, collectively termed `peas in a pod' trends. In particular, correlations in radius and mass have been interpreted as implying uniformity in planet bulk density and composition within a system. However, the samples used to assess trends in mass tend to be small and biased. In this paper, we re-evaluate correlations in planet properties in a large sample of systems with at least two planets for which mass and radius have been directly measured, and therefore bulk density can be calculated. Our sample was assembled using the most up-to-date exoplanet catalogue data, and we compute the relevant statistics while using a procedure to `weight' the data points according to measurement precision. We find a moderate correlation in radius and a weak correlation in the densities of adjacent planets. However, masses of neighbouring planets show no overall correlation in our main sample and a weak correlation among pairs of planets similar in size or pairs restricted to M$_p$<100 M$_ R$_p$<10 R$_ Similarly, we show that the intrasystem dispersion in radius is typically less than that in mass and density. We identify ranges in stellar host properties that correlate with stronger uniformity in pairs of adjacent planets: low T$_ eff $ for planet masses, and low metallicity and old age for planet densities. Furthermore, we explore whether peas in a pod trends extend into planet compositions or interior structures. For small neighbouring planets with similar radii, we show that their masses and interior structures are often disparate, indicating that even within the same system, similarity in radii is not necessarily a good proxy for similarity in composition or the physical nature of the planets.

A Quantitative Comparison of Exoplanet Catalogs

Comparison of Asteroids Observed in the SDSS with a Catalog of Known Asteroids

Comparing transit spectroscopy pipelines at the catalogue level: evidence for systematic differences

Comparison of the PPMXL and UCAC5 Catalogs with the Gaia DR2

Exoplanet Catalogues

A Statistical Comparative Planetology Approach to the Hunt for Habitable Exoplanets and Life Beyond the Solar System

EXOPLANET POPULATION INFERENCE AND THE ABUNDANCE OF EARTH ANALOGS FROM NOISY, INCOMPLETE CATALOGS

Toward a homogeneous set of transiting planet parameters

Quantifying the Similarity of Planetary System Architectures

Planets similar in size are often dissimilar in interior

The Gaia–Kepler Stellar Properties Catalog. I. Homogeneous Fundamental Properties for 186,301 Kepler Stars

Reliability Correction is Key for Robust Kepler Occurrence Rates

Inclusive Jet Production in $γp$ and $γγ$ Processes: Direct and Resolved Photon Cross Sections in Next-To-Leading Order QCD

Methods for Incorporating Model Uncertainty into Exoplanet Atmospheric Analysis

Comparing Simulated Emission from Molecular Clouds Using Experimental Design

Comparison of cloud models for Brown Dwarfs

Exoplanet Statistics and Theoretical Implications

Prevalence of Earth-size Planets Orbiting Sun-like Stars

Exploring Systematic Errors in the Inferred Parameters of the Transiting Planet KELT-15b and its Host Star

Systematic Differences in Position and Proper-Motion Between the Ppmx and Ucac3 Catalogs