Abstract:Notions of community quality underlie network clustering. While studies surrounding network clustering are increasingly common, a precise understanding of the realtionship between different cluster quality metrics is unknown. In this paper, we examine the relationship between stand-alone cluster quality metrics and information recovery metrics through a rigorous analysis of four widely-used network clustering algorithms -- Louvain, Infomap, label propagation, and smart local moving. We consider the stand-alone quality metrics of modularity, conductance, and coverage, and we consider the information recovery metrics of adjusted Rand score, normalized mutual information, and a variant of normalized mutual information used in previous work. Our study includes both synthetic graphs and empirical data sets of sizes varying from 1,000 to 1,000,000 nodes. We find significant differences among the results of the different cluster quality metrics. For example, clustering algorithms can return a value of 0.4 out of 1 on modularity but score 0 out of 1 on information recovery. We find conductance, though imperfect, to be the stand-alone quality metric that best indicates performance on information recovery metrics. Our study shows that the variant of normalized mutual information used in previous work cannot be assumed to differ only slightly from traditional normalized mutual information. Smart local moving is the best performing algorithm in our study, but discrepancies between cluster evaluation metrics prevent us from declaring it absolutely superior. Louvain performed better than Infomap in nearly all the tests in our study, contradicting the results of previous work in which Infomap was superior to Louvain. We find that although label propagation performs poorly when clusters are less clearly defined, it scales efficiently and accurately to large graphs with well-defined clusters.

To Cluster, or Not to Cluster: An Analysis of Clusterability Methods

An Effective and Efficient Approach for Clusterability Evaluation

Sparse clusterability: testing for cluster structure in high dimensions

Computational Feasibility of Clustering under Clusterability Assumptions

Clusterability test for categorical data

A Testing-Based Approach to Assess the Clusterability of Categorical Data.

A Statistical Information-Based Clustering Approach in Distance Space

Structure-Aware Distance Measures for Comparing Clusterings in Graphs.

Testing the significance of patterns in data with cluster structure

An Information-Theoretic External Cluster-Validity Measure

How Many Clusters? Which Clustering Method? Answers Via Model-Based Cluster Analysis

An Advanced Cluster Analysis Method Based on Statistical Test

Statistical power for cluster analysis

Clustering -- Basic concepts and methods

Cluster analysis: A modern statistical review

Cluster Validity Index for Adaptive Clustering Algorithms

An Experimental Comparison of Three Kinds of Clustering Algorithms

Analysis of Network Clustering Algorithms and Cluster Quality Metrics at Scale

Reviews on Determining the Number of Clusters

Clustering Approaches for Financial Data Analysis: a Survey

Unique Metric for Health Analysis with Optimization of Clustering Activity and Cross Comparison of Results from Different Approach