Abstract:1 Quantiiers as Modal Operators 1.1 Motivations The semantics for quantiiers described in this paper can be viewed both as a new semantics for generalized quantiiers and as a new look at standard rst-order quantiication, bringing the latter closer to modal logic. The standard semantics for generalized quantiiers interprets a monadic generalized quantiier Q as a set of subsets of a domain. For example, the quantiier "there are precisely two" is interpreted by the set of all subsets of the domain which contain precisely two elements. A formula Qx' is true in a model if the set of elements satisfying ' belongs to the interpretation of the quantiier; in our example, if there are precisely two elements satisfying '. The existential quantiier can be treated as a generalized quantiier, too: it is interpreted as the set of all non-empty subsets of the domain. The universal quantiier is interpreted by the singleton set containing the whole domain. The quantiiers listed so far are rst-order deenable in the following sense: they can be deened using ordinary quantiiers and equality. Many interesting generalized quanti-ers are not rst-order deenable. The present study is motivated by the work of Michiel van Lambalgen (1991) on Gentzen-style proof theory for the quantiiers "for many" (its dual is interpreted as a non-principal lter), "for uncountably many" and "for almost all" (the latter contains all subsets of the domain which have Lebesgue measure 1). All those quantiiers are not rst-order deenable. They have Hilbert-style axiomatizations, but until lately no one believed that they can have a reasonable Gentzen-style proof theory. In order to devise such a proof theory, van Lambalgen used a translation of generalized quan-tiier formulas into a rst-order language enriched with a predicate R of indeenite arity. (all free variables displayed). Observe that this translation is reminiscent of the standard translation of modal formulas into rst-order logic, with the sequence of free variables playing the role of the "actual world" and the quantiier ranging over the variables "accessible" from the given sequence. The idea behind such a translation is as follows. When generalized quantiiers are viewed as rst-order operators (binding rst-order variables), it becomes clear that a variable bound by a generalized quan-tiier cannot in general take any possible value. Its range is restricted, and this restriction can be deened using an accessibility relation. Then the elimination rule for Q with a premise Qx'(x; y) would introduce …

A Generic Framework for Implicate Generation Modulo Theories

IC3 Modulo Theories via Implicit Predicate Abstraction

Modal Quanti cation over Structured

A proof-theoretical approach to some extensions of first order quantification

A prime implicates-based formulae forgetting

The Generative Programs Framework

A novel framework for systematic propositional formula simplification based on existential graphs

Modelling Multiplicative Linear Logic via Deep Inference

Formula Transformers and Combinatorial Test Generators for Propositional Intuitionistic Theorem Provers

Generating methods of some classes of fuzzy implications obtained by unary functions and algebraic structures

Modularity and Separate Compilation in Logic Programming

Coq Modulo Theory - Short Paper

First-principles studies of modulated Co/Cu superlattices with strongly and weakly exchange-biased Co-monolayers leading to a ferrimagnetic ground state

Counterfactual Conditionals in Quantified Modal Logic

A logical framework with a graph meta-language

Nested Sequents for Intuitionistic Grammar Logics via Structural Refinement

A Formulation of the Simple Theory of Types (for Isabelle)

Proof-theoretic Semantics for the Logic of Bunched Implications

A Tableau Algorithm for Term Logic of Generic Sentences

Lazy Model Expansion: Interleaving Grounding with Search

Program Synthesis as Dependency Quantified Formula Modulo Theory