Abstract:Taking advantage of nearly 4 million transition records for three years in London from a popular location-based social network service, Foursquare, we study how to track the impact and measure the effectiveness of cultural investment in small urban areas. We reveal the underlying relationships between socio-economic status, local cultural expenditure, and network features extracted from user mobility trajectories. This research presents how geo-social and mobile services more generally can be used as a proxy to track local changes as government financial effort is put in developing urban areas, and thus gives evidence and suggestions for further policy-making and investment optimization.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of how to track and quantify the socioeconomic impact of cultural investment in small urban areas using data from location-based social networks (such as Foursquare). Specifically, the authors aim to uncover the potential relationships between socioeconomic status, local cultural expenditure, and network characteristics extracted from user mobility trajectories. Through these studies, evidence can be provided for government funding in urban development, and recommendations can be made for future policy-making and investment optimization.
### The main research questions of the paper include:
1. **How to use location-based social network data to track the socioeconomic impact of cultural investment?**
- The authors used nearly 4 million user mobility records from Foursquare, covering a 3-year period in London.
- By analyzing these data, the authors hope to quantify the impact of cultural investment on the urban regeneration process.
2. **What is the relationship between cultural investment and socioeconomic status?**
- The authors propose two hypotheses:
- [H1] Areas with high cultural investment and high deprivation levels have significant differences in network and local attributes compared to areas with low cultural investment and low deprivation levels.
- [H2] Areas with high cultural investment and high deprivation levels experience significant growth in network and local attributes, while areas with low cultural investment and low deprivation levels do not.
3. **How to reveal these relationships through network analysis and statistical analysis methods?**
- The authors defined new indicators of cultural investment and cultural characteristics, combined with traditional network analysis methods, to measure the importance of cultural investment in urban areas.
- Through ANOVA analysis, the authors tested whether there are significant differences in network and local attributes in different areas in terms of cultural investment and socioeconomic status, and how these differences change over time.
### Research background and motivation:
- **"Bilbao Miracle"**: In 1997, the establishment of the Guggenheim Museum not only brought significant socioeconomic development to the Spanish port city of Bilbao but also demonstrated the potential of cultural investment for urban development.
- **Insufficiency of existing research**: Although the ability of cultural investment to promote local regeneration is widely accepted, its large-scale evaluation and prediction have not been widely applied.
- **Innovation in data sources**: The vast amount of human mobility trajectory data provided by location-based applications has not been fully utilized in culture-led urban regeneration research.
### Data and methods:
- **Socioeconomic data**: The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) is used to assess the socioeconomic status of various areas.
- **Cultural expenditure data**: Local government revenue expenditure and financing data are used to measure cultural expenditure.
- **Foursquare data**: Includes user mobility records and venue information in London over 3 years.
- **Network analysis**: Foursquare data is represented as a geographic social network connected by user transition flows, and network attributes are analyzed through network metrics (such as in-degree centrality, out-degree centrality, and average clustering coefficient).
### Main findings:
- **Areas with different initial deprivation levels and cultural expenditure priorities exhibit different network patterns**.
- **Areas with high cultural investment and high deprivation levels show significant growth in network attributes**.
- **Areas with higher cultural investment perform better in terms of the number of created venues, number of nodes, in-degree centrality, out-degree centrality, and venue density**.
### Conclusion:
- This study provides a new method for tracking and quantifying the socioeconomic impact of cultural investment using location-based social network data.
- The research results are significant for location-based mobile systems, local governments, and policymakers, helping to optimize investment strategies for urban development.