Scratching a 50-year itch with elongated rods

Ramon Creyghton,Bela Mulder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2018.1481234

2018-06-22

Abstract:The classical Oseen-Frank theory of liquid crystal elasticity is based on the experimentally verified fact that there are three independent modes of distortion, each with its associated elastic constant. On the other hand, the arguably more first-principles order parameter-based Landau-de Gennes theory only involves two independent elastic modes. The resulting 'elastic constants problem' has led to a considerable amount of vexation among theorists. In a series of papers at the turn of the century, Fukuda and Yokoyama suggested that the resolution of this problem could be found in the proper treatment of non-local effects in the ideal part of the free energy. They used an ingenious, but technically complex, technique based on a field-theoretic approach to semi-flexible polymers. Here we revisit their idea but now in the more accessible framework of density functional theory of rigid particles. Our work recovers their main results for rod-like particles, in that generically an ordered assembly of non-interacting rods has three independent elastic constants associated to it that all scale as the square of the length of the particles and obey the inequalities $K_2 < K_1 < K_3$. We also consider the case of disc-like particles, and then find in line with expectations that $K_3 < K_1 < K_2$.

Soft Condensed Matter

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is related to the "elastic constant problem" in the liquid - crystal elasticity theory. Specifically, the classical Oseen - Frank theory holds that there are three independent elastic modes in liquid crystals during elastic deformation, and each mode corresponds to an independent elastic constant. However, based on the Landau - de Gennes theory, due to the requirements of its symmetry, only two independent elastic constants can be derived. This theoretical inconsistency has led to long - term debates and confusion.

The main contribution of the paper lies in re - examining the view proposed by Fukuda and Yokoyama, that is, by considering non - local effects (especially the influence of the finite length of particles on the ideal part of the free energy), it is possible to explain why there are three independent elastic constants within the framework of density functional theory. By assuming that the particles are rigid and have a finite length, the authors derived specific expressions for these elastic constants and verified that these constants do exist and satisfy a specific inequality relationship \( K_2 < K_1 < K_3 \). In addition, they also extended this theory to consider the case of disk - like particles and found that the elastic constants of disk - like particles satisfy \( K_3 < K_1 < K_2 \), which is as expected.

### Summary of main problems:
1. **Elastic constant problem**: There is an inconsistency between the Oseen - Frank theory and the Landau - de Gennes theory in predicting the number of liquid - crystal elastic constants.
2. **Non - local effects**: By considering the finite length of particles and non - local effects, explain why there are three independent elastic constants.
3. **Rigid particle model**: Using the density functional theory (DFT) framework and assuming that the particles are rigid, derive expressions for elastic constants.
4. **Elastic constants of particles with different shapes**: Not only consider rod - like particles, but also extend to disk - like particles to verify the differences in elastic constants of particles with different shapes.

### Key formulas:
- **Free energy density in Oseen - Frank theory**:
\[
f_d^{(\text{O - F})}(r)=\frac{1}{2}K_1(\nabla\cdot\hat{n})^2+\frac{1}{2}K_2(\hat{n}\cdot\nabla\times\hat{n})^2+\frac{1}{2}K_3(\hat{n}\times\nabla\times\hat{n})^2
\]
- **Free energy density in Landau - de Gennes theory**:
\[
f_d^{(\text{LdG})}(r)=\frac{1}{2}L_1\partial_\alpha Q_{\beta\gamma}(r)\partial_\alpha Q_{\beta\gamma}(r)+\frac{1}{2}L_2\partial_\alpha Q_{\alpha\gamma}(r)\partial_\beta Q_{\beta\gamma}(r)
\]
- **Expressions for elastic constants**:
\[
K_1 = \frac{1}{48}\rho\beta L^2(2U + S(15 - 2U))
\]
\[
K_2=\frac{1}{144}\rho\beta L^2(2U + S(15 - 2U))
\]
\[
K_3=-\frac{1}{36}\rho\beta L^2(2U + S(15 + 4U))
\]

Through these formulas, the authors successfully explained why three independent elastic constants can be obtained when considering non - local effects, thus solving the long - existing "elastic constant problem".