Tubarial Gland Sparing with Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancers: A Pilot Study of Dosimetric Feasibility

N.S. Kalman,S. Yarlagadda,N. McAllister,A.E. Rzepczynski,T. Kutuk
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.01.055
IF: 8.013
2024-04-01
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Abstract:Purpose/Objective(s) Tubarial glands have been newly identified as a potential organ at risk (OAR) for head and neck cancer radiation therapy. However, the feasibility of sparing them is yet to be determined. In this study, we hypothesized that intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), which is widely utilized in the treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma, would reduce the mean dose to the tubarial glands without a significant difference in target coverage. Materials/Methods With approval from the Institutional Review Board, seventeen patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma who received curative intent definitive radiation therapy were included in the study. Patient baseline and tumor characteristics were extracted from electronic medical records. Tubarial glands were delineated for each patient and the treatment plans were re-optimized to limit the mean dose to the new OARs to as low as reasonably achievable. Each patient's dosimetric parameters from the clinically treated IMRT plan and the newly re-optimized plan were recorded and a paired t-test was performed to compare the mean dose for tubarial glands and target coverage (D99% for high-risk, intermediate-risk, and low-risk clinical target volumes) between the clinical plan and the re-optimized plan. Results Among the 17 patients, 10 (59%) had tonsil and 7 (41%) had base of tongue primary sites. All patients received definitive radiation (66-70 Gy/30-35 fractions) with concurrent cisplatin. Mean tubarial gland volume was 4.23 cc (Interquartile range [IQR]-3.6-4.7 cc) on the left and 4.25 cc (IQR-3.57-4.85 cc) on the right. The clinical plans had a mean dose of 49.7 Gy (IQR-34-65 Gy) and 27.7 Gy (IQR-8.9-50.5 Gy) for the ipsilateral and contralateral tubarial glands, respectively. The difference in mean doses between the clinical and re-optimized plans were 4.9 Gy (95% CI: 3.3-6.6 Gy; p<0.01) and 7.0 Gy (95% CI: 5.0-8.9 Gy; p<0.01) for the ipsilateral and contralateral tubarial glands, respectively. Based on the distance between the target volume and tubarial gland, a difference in the mean dose of 0.2-13.5 Gy was observed, and 7 patients (41%) had ≥10 Gy reduction in dose to either side. A small decrease in high risk target coverage was noted, but all re-optimized plans met departmental dosimetric goals (mean difference in HR-CTV D99% - 0.8% (95% CI: 0.48-1.26%; p<0.01), IR-CTV D99% - 0.7% (95% CI: -2.35-3.78; p=0.62) and LR-CTV D99% - 1.4% (95% CI: -3.04-5.94; p=0.5). Conclusion This pilot study demonstrates the dosimetric feasibility of tubarial gland sparing with IMRT for oropharyngeal carcinoma. Dosimetric constraints for this new OAR need to be determined with larger studies.
oncology,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?