Abstract:Personality and Social Psychology Review, Ahead of Print. A large body of research has investigated responses to artificial scenarios (e.g., trolley problem) where maximizing beneficial outcomes for the greater good (utilitarianism) conflicts with adherence to moral norms (deontology). The CNI model is a computational model that quantifies sensitivity to consequences for the greater good (C), sensitivity to moral norms (N), and general preference for inaction versus action (I) in responses to plausible moral dilemmas based on real-world events. Expanding on a description of the CNI model, the current article provides (a) a comprehensive review of empirical findings obtained with the CNI model, (b) an analysis of their theoretical implications, (c) a discussion of criticisms of the CNI model, and (d) an overview of alternative approaches to disentangle multiple factors underlying moral-dilemma responses and the relation of these approaches to the CNI model. The article concludes with a discussion of open questions and new directions for future research.Public How do people make judgments about actions that violate moral norms yet maximize the greater good (e.g., sacrificing the well-being of a small number of people for the well-being of a larger number of people)? Research on this question has been criticized for relying on highly artificial scenarios and for conflating multiple distinct factors underlying responses in moral dilemmas. The current article reviews research that used a computational modeling approach to disentangle the roles of multiple distinct factors in responses to plausible moral dilemmas based on real-world events. By disentangling sensitivity to consequences, sensitivity to moral norms, and general preference for inaction versus action in responses to realistic dilemmas, the reviewed work provides a more nuanced understanding of how people make judgments about the right course of action in moral dilemmas.

How To Solve Moral Conundrums with Computability Theory

On the computational complexity of ethics: moral tractability for minds and machines

Culture, Computation, Morality

Beyond Trolleyology: The CNI Model of Moral-Dilemma Responses

Computer Says I Don’t Know: An Empirical Approach to Capture Moral Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence

Why Machines Can't Be Moral: Turing's Halting Problem and the Moral Limits of Artificial Intelligence

Non-Computability of Consciousness

Towards a theory of consciousness: Proposal for the resolution of the homunculus fallacy with predictions

Why should we ever automate moral decision making?

A Computational Model of Commonsense Moral Decision Making

AI Consciousness is Inevitable: A Theoretical Computer Science Perspective

Natural Language Semantics and Computability

Practical Intractability: A Critique of the Hypercomputation Movement

Moral Dilemmas for Moral Machines

Taking Turing by Surprise? Designing Digital Computers for morally-loaded contexts

From computational ethics to morality: how decision-making algorithms can help us understand the emergence of moral principles, the existence of an optimal behaviour and our ability to discover it

A Theory of Consciousness from a Theoretical Computer Science Perspective: Insights from the Conscious Turing Machine

Between Turing and Kleene

First Draft on the xInf Model for Universal Physical Computation and Reverse Engineering of Natural Intelligence

Moral Considerations of Artificial Intelligence

Interactive Machines and Its Implication in Scientific Realism