Abstract:Abstract Group living is beneficial for individuals, but also comes with costs. One such cost is the increased possibility of pathogen transmission because increased numbers or frequencies of social contacts are often associated with increased parasite abundance or diversity. The social structure of a group or population is paramount to patterns of infection and transmission. Yet, for various reasons, studies investigating the links between sociality and parasitism in animals, especially in primates, have only accounted for parts of the group (e.g., only adults), which is likely to impact the interpretation of results. Here, we investigated the relationship between social network centrality and an estimate of gastrointestinal helminth infection intensity in a whole group of Japanese macaques ( Macaca fuscata ). We then tested the impact of omitting parts of the group on this relationship. We aimed to test: (1) whether social network centrality – in terms of the number of partners (degree), frequency of interactions (strength), and level of social integration (eigenvector) – was linked to parasite infection intensity (estimated by eggs per gram of faeces, EPG); and, (2) to what extent excluding portions of individuals within the group might influence the observed relationship. We conducted social network analysis on data collected from one group of Japanese macaques over three months on Koshima Island, Japan. We then ran a series of knock-out simulations. General linear mixed models showed that, at the whole-group level, network centrality was positively associated with geohelminth infection intensity. However, in partial networks with only adult females, only juveniles, or random subsets of the group, the strength of this relationship - albeit still generally positive - lost statistical significance. Furthermore, knock-out simulations where individuals were removed but network metrics were retained from the original whole-group network, showed that this is partly a power issue and partly a real effect of incomplete network. Our study indicates that sampling bias can thus hamper our ability to detect real network effects involving social interaction and parasitism. In addition to supporting earlier results linking geohelminth infection to Japanese macaque social networks, this work introduces important methodological considerations for research into the dynamics of social transmission, with implications for infectious disease epidemiology, population management, and health interventions.

A reply to 'Ranging Behavior Drives Parasite Richness: A More Parsimonious Hypothesis'

Specialist by preference, generalist by need: availability of quality hosts drives parasite choice in a natural multihost-parasite system.

Experimental manipulation of food availability and macroparasite prevalence reveal differential effects on space use in wild rodents

Parasite Abundance‐Occupancy Relationships Across Biogeographic Regions: Joint Effects of Niche Breadth, Host Availability and Climate

Parasite biodiversity revisited: frontiers and constraints

Paradigms for parasite conservation

Linking parasitism to network centrality and the impact of sampling bias in its interpretation

Nonrandom foraging and resource distributions affect the relationships between host density, contact rates and parasite transmission

Parasite insight: assessing fitness costs, infection risks and foraging benefits relating to gastrointestinal nematodes in wild mammalian herbivores

Response to comment on 'Unexpected plasticity in the life cycle of Trypanosoma Brucei'

Parasite β-diversity along a stream: effect of distance and environment

Diverging effects of host density and richness across biological scales drive diversity-disease outcomes

Population density drives increased parasitism via greater exposure and reduced resource availability in wild hosts

Phanerozoic parasitism and marine metazoan diversity: dilution versus amplification

Taking cues from ecological and evolutionary theories to expand the landscape of disgust

A unifying framework for the transient parasite dynamics of migratory hosts

The Allee Effect in Hosts Can Weaken the Dilution Effect of Host Diversity on Parasitoid Infections

Network specificity decreases community stability and competition among avian haemosporidian parasites and their hosts

Parasite prevalence is determined by infection state- and risk-dependent dispersal of the host

Resetting our expectations for parasites and their effects on species interactions: a meta-analysis

Maintenance of parasite species diversity: Spatiotemporal niche partitioning and aggregation facilitate species coexistence