Competitive Action Repertoires and Stock Risk
Walter J. Ferrier,Margaret Hughes-Morgan
2014-03-22
Abstract:Research in competitive dynamics has long demonstrated a clear link between competitive action and a variety of measures of firm performance, such as profitability, revenue growth, changes in market share and market share rank, reputation, and stock returns (Chen and Miller, 2012; Grimm et al., 2006; Ketchen et at., 2004; Smith et al., 2001). Yet, the relationship between competitive action and one potentially important determinant of stock returns, stock risk, has not been explored in the 25 or more years since the Bettis and Weeks (1987) study of how the stock market reacted to competitive battle between Kodak and Polaroid. Based on a review of relevant literature in competitive dynamics and finance, this is surprising when one considers theory and empirical evidence about the relationship between competitive strategy and stock returns and, separately, the relationship between stock risk and stock returns. In particular, prior research found that characteristics of the firm's set of competitive actions impacts its stock returns (Ferrier and Lee, 2002; Rindova et at., 2010). Further, a rich vein of research in corporate finance has shown that important firm-level organizational characteristics, including strategy, affect the firm's stock risk (Beaver et al., 1970; Bowman, 1980; I Lunada, 1969; Haugan, 1979). So, exploring the strategyrelated antecedents of stock risk is important because the level of risk associated with a firm's stock impacts its price and returns in ensuing time periods (Van Horne, 1980). These issues motivated the core research question of this study; How does a firm's set of competitive actions influence stock risk? This study extends research in competitive dynamics that has linked competitive action to stock market outcomes. Observed Strategy, Sense-Giving Signals, and Information Processing Fluency The process by which investors observe, make sense of, and evaluate competitive strategy rests on their ability to perceive and process a rich variety of signals associated with observed elements of the strategy and other organizational and managerial attributes. Signaling theory has been widely used in the finance literature, mainly in the area of signaling firm quality to investors. For instance, a firm's dividend policy serves as a signal for future earnings (Bhattacharya, 1979; John and Williams, 1985). Similarly, the underpricing of secondary stock offerings serves as a signal of poor firm quality (Cook and Officer, 1996). Signaling has also been used by management scholars to explain how top management team (TMT) legitimacy, as proxied by TMT members' average age and company tenure, serves as a signal for high firm quality which, in turn, reduced IPO underpricing (Cohen and Dean, 2005). Also, the composition of a firm's board of directors signals firm quality and was found to have a positive influence on the IPO values (Certo, 2003; Certo et al., 2001). This study aims to build a predictive framework that explains how specific structural characteristics of the firm's repertoire (set) of competitive actions carried out in a given time period impacts the stock market's reaction to the firm's observed strategy. As will be discussed more fully below, a firm's repertoire of competitive actions can vary in composition and dynamism, from a set of competitive moves that are stable, predictable, and changing incrementally, to competitive behavior characterized by extreme change, unpredictability, surprise, and disruption (D'Aveni, 1994). Investor/observers must decide whether observed and embedded properties associated with a given firm's competitive action repertoire--relative to that of its rival - signal better future performance for the firm. Consistent with the actions-as-manifest-strategy view (Grimm et al., 2006), competitive actions serve as strategic signals (Heil and Robertson, 1991; Prabhu and Stewart, 2001) that form the basis for sense-making (Bogner and Barr, 2000; Gioia and Chittipeddi, 1991; Whetten, 1984). …
Economics,Business