Abstract:Test smell refers to poor programming and design practices in testing and widely spreads throughout software projects. Considering test smells have negative impacts on the comprehension and maintenance of test code and even make code-under-test more defect-prone, it thus has great importance in mining, detecting, and refactoring them. Since Deursen et al. introduced the definition of “test smell”, several studies worked on discovering new test smells from test specifications and software practitioners’ experience. Indeed, many bad testing practices are “observed” by software developers during creating test scripts rather than through academic research and are widely discussed in the software engineering community (e.g., Stack Overflow) [ 70 , 94 ]. However, no prior studies explored new bad testing practices from software practitioners’ discussions, formally defined them as new test smell types, and analyzed their characteristics, which plays a bad role for developers in knowing these bad practices and avoiding using them during test code development. Therefore, we pick up those challenges and act by working on systematic methods to explore new test smell types from one of the most mainstream developers’ Q&A platforms, i.e., Stack Overflow. We further investigate the harmfulness of new test smells and analyze possible solutions for eliminating them. We find that some test smells make it hard for developers to fix failed test cases and trace their failing reasons. To exacerbate matters, we have identified two types of test smells that pose a risk to the accuracy of test cases. Next, we develop a detector to detect test smells from software. The detector is composed of six detection methods for different smell types. These detection methods are both wrapped with a set of syntactic rules based on the code patterns extracted from different test smells and developers’ code styles. We manually construct a test smell dataset from seven popular Java projects and evaluate the effectiveness of our detector on it. The experimental results show that our detector achieves high performance in precision, recall, and F1 score. Then, we utilize our detector to detect smells from 919 real-world Java projects to explore whether the six test smells are prevalent in practice. We observe that these test smells are widely spread in 722 out of 919 Java projects, which demonstrates that they are prevalent in real-world projects. Finally, to validate the usefulness of test smells in practice, we submit 56 issue reports to 53 real-world projects with different smells. Our issue reports achieve 76.4% acceptance by conducting sentiment analysis on developers’ replies. These evaluations confirm the effectiveness of our detector and the prevalence and practicality of new test smell types on real-world projects.

Characterizing the Usage, Evolution and Impact of Java Annotations in Practice

The Lost World: Characterizing and Detecting Undiscovered Test Smells.

A Large-Scale Empirical Study of Open Source License Usage: Practices and Challenges

[Journal First] Measuring Program Comprehension: A Large-Scale Field Study with Professionals

DeepAnna: Deep Learning Based Java Annotation Recommendation and Misuse Detection

How do annotations affect Java code readability?

An Empirical Study of Long Method and God Method in Industrial Projects.

Measuring Program Comprehension: A Large-Scale Field Study with Professionals

Survey of Data Annotation

An Empirical Study of the Impact of Code Smell on File Changes

Understanding and Detecting Annotation-Induced Faults of Static Analyzers

Towards Understanding Fixes of SonarQube Static Analysis Violations: A Large-Scale Empirical Study

An Exploratory Study of Logging Configuration Practice in Java

Mining the Contributions Along the Lifecycles of Open-Source Projects

A First Look at Emoji Usage on GitHub: An Empirical Study

Large‐scale characterization of Java streams

A Survey on Annotations in Information Visualization: Empirical Insights, Applications, and Challenges

Empirical study of software quality evolution in open source projects using agile practices

An Empirical Study of Developer Quality

Exploring GitHub Topics: Unveiling Their Content and Potential