Abstract:Openness and sharing of discovery lie at the heart of the scientific method. Yet historically, the data and reports upon which they are based have not been easily accessible and often require onerous efforts to obtain. From this was borne the open data movement, which has advanced research and transformed public health policy-making in countries that have embraced this change. Open health data refers to unrestricted, free-of-charge access to health data [1]. By making health data available to all without any limitations to its reuse, it leverages national transparency, accountability, participation, innovation, and research through a multitude of data sources in large volumes—as well as paving the way for the creation of novel citizen-centric services [1,2]. The ability to access and combine diverse health data enriches analytical capacity and evaluation that can inform national policy development and improve healthcare delivery [3,4]. Open health data is therefore a public resource and should be delivered purposefully and proactively, in line with user needs and its potential contribution to value creation [2]. However, the open data movement comes with the need to balance its benefits with the security and privacy challenges that come with it, such as the risk of re-identification [4]. The issue of selling medical data to commercial organizations such as pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies, and other private companies has also stirred much controversy and raised concerns about ethicality, reproducibility, and generalizability [5]. Undeniably, challenges to the implementation of open health data remain, including the lack of awareness of its potential benefits, unsteady leadership and accountability, and weak legal and ethical oversight. Additionally, addressing the enormous gap in resources and knowledge on tools and techniques is acutely needed to make the technological shift to open and interoperable databases with unified protocols, frameworks, and terminology [3]. Despite the challenges in open health data, numerous countries and institutions have proven its feasibility with the proper legislation and implementation. By incorporating formal requirements in national open data strategies, laws, and regulations, the majority of Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) member countries have successfully adopted and scaled up "open by default" and "government as platform" approaches to data [2]. This has resulted in stronger governance frameworks and an increase in data availability, paving the way for the publication and use of open government data in various sectors geared towards social, government, and business innovation, with potentially important implications for public sector integrity, sustainable development, and gender equality [2]. With the passage of its e-government law, Germany has catapulted its data accessibility in recent years to provide data in machine-readable formats, with metadata descriptions, free of charge, and with unrestricted access for reuse [2]. Upon adoption of its Open Data Charter, Canada also released a number of online databases, such as The Public Health InfoBase and PulseNet Canada, which offer easy-to-use tools for accessing public health data on chronic diseases, mental health conditions, and foodborne molecular surveillance, to name a few [3]. Additionally, the widely utilized, freely-accessible critical care MIMIC databases have provided scientific opportunities for academic and industrial research, quality improvement initiatives, and higher education coursework [6–8]. Conversely, there is a critical need for the United Nations and other global organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) to develop and espouse open health data as a global strategy as this movement consequently cascades to the regional and national levels.

Epidemiological data challenges: planning for a more robust future through data standards

Data Equity as a Building Block for Health Equity: Improving Surveillance Data for People With Disabilities, With Substance Use Disorder, or Experiencing Homelessness, United States

The challenges of data usage for the United States' COVID-19 response

Big Data Analytics, Infectious Diseases and Associated Ethical Impacts

Data sharing in public health emergencies: a call to researchers

Public reporting guidelines for outbreak data: Enabling accountability for effective outbreak response by developing standards for transparency and uniformity

Converge or Collide? Making Sense of a Plethora of Open Data Standards in Health Care

Considerations towards the better integration of epidemiology into quantitative risk assessment

FAIR data sharing: The roles of common data elements and harmonization

Deceptiveness of internet data for disease surveillance

Call to action for global and national actors for open health data

International scientific communication on COVID-19 data: management pitfalls understanding

Inaccessibility and low maintenance of medical data archive in low-middle income countries: Mystery behind public health statistics and measures

Availability, access, analysis and dissemination of small-area data

Infectious Disease Surveillance in the Big Data Era: Towards Faster and Locally Relevant Systems

Sources of spatial animal and human health data: Casting the net wide to deal more effectively with increasingly complex disease problems

Big Data in Epidemiology: Brave New World?

Data sharing governance in sub-Saharan Africa during public health emergencies: Gaps and guidance

Improving the integration of epidemiological data into human health risk assessment: What risk assessors told us they want

Data sharing, management, use, and reuse: Practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide

Challenges in disaster data collection during recent disasters