Subatomic systems need not be subatomic

Luca Roversi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.08105
2018-04-22
Abstract:Subatomic systems were recently introduced to identify the structural principles underpinning the normalization of proofs. "Subatomic" means that we can reformulate logical systems in accordance with two principles. Their atomic formulas become instances of sub-atoms, non-commutative self-dual relations among logical constants, and their rules are derivable by means of a unique deductive scheme, the medial shape. One of the results is that the cut-elimination of subatomic systems implies the cut-elimination of every standard system we can represent sub-atomically. We here introduce Subatomic systems-1.1. They relax and widen the properties that the sub-atoms of Subatomic systems can satisfy while maintaining the use of the medial shape as their only inference principle. Since sub-atoms can operate directly on variables we introduce P. The cut-elimination of P is a corollary of the cut-elimination that we prove for Subatomic systems-1.1. Moreover, P is sound and complete with respect to the clone at the top of Post's Lattice. I.e. P proves all and only the tautologies that contain conjunctions, disjunctions and projections. So, P extends Propositional logic without any encoding of its atoms as sub-atoms of P. This shows that the logical principles underpinning Subatomic systems also apply outside the sub-atomic level which they are conceived to work at. We reinforce this point of view by introducing the set R of medial shapes. The formulas that the rules in R deal with belong to the union of two disjoint clones of Post's Lattice. The SAT-problem of the first clone is in P-Time. The SAT-problem of the other is NP-Time complete. So, R and the proof technology of Subatomic systems could help to identify proof-theoretical properties that highlight the phase transition from P-Time to NP-Time complete satisfiability.
Logic in Computer Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is to identify and understand the structural principles behind the normalization of proofs. Specifically, the author introduces and develops the concept of "subatomic systems", aiming to reformulate logical systems through two main principles: 1. **Atomic formulas become subatomic instances**: namely non - commutative self - dual relations. 2. **Rules are derived from a single inference pattern**: namely the so - called "medial shape". ### Main contributions of the paper - **Expand the definition of subatomic systems**: Expand from the original version 1.0 to version 1.1, relax the properties that subatomic can satisfy, while still using the medial shape as the only inference principle. - **Introduce the P - system**: Show that the logical principles of subatomic systems are applicable not only at the subatomic level, but also to broader logical systems. The P - system is sound and complete in the top - level clone of the Post lattice and can prove all tautologies containing conjunction, disjunction and projection. - **Study the R23 set**: Introduce a set of medial shapes R23, whose formulas belong to the union of two disjoint clones C2 and C3 in the Post lattice. This helps to reveal the phase transition from P - Time to NP - Time full satisfiability. ### Specific problem solutions #### What problem does this paper attempt to solve? The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to identify and simplify the proof normalization process of logical systems through the formal framework of subatomic systems. Specifically, the author hopes to solve the problem through the following points: 1. **Structural principles of normalized proofs**: Through subatomic systems, the author hopes to find a unified way to describe the normalization process of different logical systems. 2. **Expand the scope of application**: By introducing the P - system, the author shows that the logical principles of subatomic systems can be applied to broader logical systems, not just at the subatomic level. 3. **Computational complexity analysis**: By introducing the R23 set, the author explores how to use subatomic systems to study the phase transition from P - Time to NP - Time full satisfiability, thus providing a new perspective for understanding computational complexity. ### Formula display The formulas involved in the paper are as follows: - **Medial shape rule**: \[ (A\alpha B)\beta(C\gamma D)\quad\text{and}\quad(A\beta C)\alpha(B\delta D) \] where \(A, B, C, D\) are formulas, and \(\alpha, \beta, \gamma, \delta\) are relations. - **Law of excluded middle**: \[ u_\alpha\vdash A\alpha A \] where \(u_\alpha\) is the unit element. - **Idempotent law**: \[ A\vee A\vdash A \] These formulas show how subatomic systems achieve proof normalization through specific inference rules and ensure the soundness and completeness of logical systems.