Abstract:Many questions in evolutionary biology require the specification of a phylogeny for downstream phylogenetic analyses. However, with the increasingly widespread availability of genomic data, phylogenetic studies are often confronted with conflicting signal in the form of genomic heterogeneity and incongruence between gene trees and the species tree. This raises the question of determining what data and phylogeny should be used in downstream analyses, and to what extent the choice of phylogeny (e.g., gene trees versus species trees) impacts the analyses and their outcomes. In this paper, we study this question in the realm of phylogenetic diversity indices, which provide ways to prioritize species for conservation based on their relative evolutionary isolation on a phylogeny, and are thus one example of downstream phylogenetic analyses. We use the Fair Proportion (FP) index, also known as the evolutionary distinctiveness score, and explore the variability in species rankings based on gene trees as compared to the species tree for several empirical data sets. Our results indicate that prioritization rankings among species vary greatly depending on the underlying phylogeny, suggesting that the choice of phylogeny is a major influence in assessing phylogenetic diversity in a conservation setting. While we use phylogenetic diversity conservation as an example, we suspect that other types of downstream phylogenetic analyses such as ancestral state reconstruction are similarly affected by genomic heterogeneity and incongruence. Our aim is thus to raise awareness of this issue and inspire new research on which evolutionary information (species trees, gene trees, or a combination of both) should form the basis for analyses in these settings.

The Fair Proportion is a Shapley Value on phylogenetic networks too

Comparing the rankings obtained from two biodiversity indices: the Fair Proportion Index and the Shapley Value

Absolute Shapley Value

Phylogenetic diversity and biodiversity indices on phylogenetic networks

Cooperative networks and f-Shapley value

An interchange property for the rooted phylogenetic subnet diversity on phylogenetic networks

How tree-based is my network? Proximity measures for unrooted phylogenetic networks

Cherry picking in forests: A new characterization for the unrooted hybrid number of two phylogenetic trees

Evolution of collective fairness in complex networks through degree-based role assignment

Explaining the data or explaining a model? Shapley values that uncover non-linear dependencies

Structural properties of proportional fairness: stability and insensitivity

Phylogenetic diversity indices from an affine and projective viewpoint

Fair Sharing: The Shapley Value for Ride-Sharing and Routing Games

Fair Allocation in Crowd-Sourced Systems

Implications of gene tree heterogeneity on downstream phylogenetic analyses: A case study employing the Fair Proportion index

The space of tree-based phylogenetic networks

Tripartitions do not always discriminate phylogenetic networks

On the Ratio of Shannon Numbers of Graphs

A note on the per capita Shapley support levels value

Shapley Value Approximation Based on Complementary Contribution

Fair representation and a linear Shapley rule