Abstract:We raise and explore possible answers to three questions about the evolution and ecology of silent flight of owls: (1) do owls fly silently for stealth, or is it to reduce self-masking? Current evidence slightly favors the self-masking hypothesis, but this question remains unsettled. (2) Two of the derived wing features that apparently evolved to suppress flight sound are the vane fringes and dorsal velvet of owl wing feathers. Do these two features suppress aerodynamic noise (sounds generated by airflow), or do they instead reduce structural noise, such as frictional sounds of feathers rubbing during flight? The aerodynamic noise hypothesis lacks empirical support. Several lines of evidence instead support the hypothesis that the velvet and fringe reduce frictional sound, including: the anatomical location of the fringe and velvet, which is best developed in wing and tail regions prone to rubbing, rather than in areas exposed to airflow; the acoustic signature of rubbing, which is broadband and includes ultrasound, is present in the flight of other birds but not owls; and the apparent relationship between the velvet and friction barbules found on the remiges of other birds. (3) Have other animals also evolved silent flight? Wing features in nightbirds (nocturnal members of Caprimulgiformes) suggest that they may have independently evolved to fly in relative silence, as have more than one diurnal hawk (Accipitriformes). We hypothesize that bird flight is noisy because wing feathers are intrinsically predisposed to rub and make frictional noise. This hypothesis suggests a new perspective: rather than regarding owls as silent, perhaps it is bird flight that is loud. This implies that bats may be an overlooked model for silent flight. Owl flight may not be the best (and certainly, not the only) model for "bio-inspiration" of silent flight.

Analysis of the Low-Frequency Vibration of EMS Maglev Vehicles

Particle-image velocimetry investigation of the fluid-structure interaction mechanisms of a natural owl wing

[Infections in 100 heart transplantation patients].

Interaction of barn owl leading edge serrations with freestream turbulence

Dataset on permeability of wings from owls and non-silently flying birds

Communication, Linguistic Understanding and Minimal Rationality in the Tradition of Universal Grammar

Antifungal activity of dihydrobenzofuran neolignans

Evolution and Ecology of Silent Flight in Owls and Other Flying Vertebrates

Investigation of force sensors for use in bipedal humanoid dynamic gait generation

Flow Features of the Near Wake of the Australian Boobook Owl (Ninox boobook) During Flapping Flight Suggest an Aerodynamic Mechanism of Sound Suppression for Stealthy Flight

[Infantile hemangiomas: differential diagnosis and associated anomalies].

Renin location in contracted human kidneys.

Nature-inspired three-dimensional surface serration topologies enable silent flight by suppressing airfoil-turbulence interaction noise

Aeroacoustic interaction between owl-inspired trailing-edge fringes and leading-edge serrations

Cytokines: the kidney as a model for their role in tissue injury and repair.

Feather aerodynamics suggest importance of lift and flow predictability over drag minimization

Numerical investigation of aerodynamic and acoustic characteristics of bionic airfoils inspired by bird wing

Characterization of Wing Kinematics by Decoupling Joint Movement in the Pigeon

Aerodynamic Properties of Avian Flight as a Function of Wing Shape

Macro- and Microstructural Features from the Feathers of Four Columbidae Species

The influence of flight style on the aerodynamic properties of avian wings as fixed lifting surfaces