Abstract:As the frontiers of applied statistics progress through increasingly complex experiments we must exploit increasingly sophisticated inferential models to analyze the observations we make. In order to avoid misleading or outright erroneous inferences we then have to be increasingly diligent in scrutinizing the consequences of those modeling assumptions. Fortunately model-based methods of statistical inference naturally define procedures for quantifying the scope of inferential outcomes and calibrating corresponding decision making processes. In this paper I review the construction and implementation of the particular procedures that arise within frequentist and Bayesian methodologies.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to avoid misleading or incorrect inferences by calibrating model - based inference and decision - making processes in complex experiments and observations. With the progress of applied statistics, experiments are becoming more and more complex, and researchers need to use more complex models to analyze observational data. However, the more complex the model is, the more subtle its inference results and the decisions made therefrom will be. Therefore, understanding the impact of different measurement implementations on inference and decision - making has become a key aspect of designing and evaluating new observational efforts. This paper aims to review how to formally calibrate inference results in the frequentist and Bayesian methods, and discuss the conceptual and practical challenges of these calibration procedures, as well as their applications in traditional discovery and limit - setting. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following core issues: 1. **Model configuration space**: Defines the model configuration space, which is the space that contains all possible data - generating processes. Each model configuration represents a possible data - generating mechanism. 2. **Model - based loss function**: Introduces how to define model - based loss functions, which are used to quantify the relative losses of different actions under specific model configurations. 3. **Frequentist sensitivity and calibration**: Discusses in detail the frequentist inference methods, including the definition of point estimators and confidence sets, and how to calibrate these estimators by maximizing the expected loss. 4. **Bayesian sensitivity and calibration**: Introduces the Bayesian inference method, including the introduction of prior distributions, and how to update the prior distribution by Bayes' theorem to obtain the posterior distribution, thereby conducting sensitivity analysis and calibration. 5. **Calibration of discovery statements**: Discusses how to handle discovery statements in the calibration process, including hypothesis testing and Bayesian model comparison. 6. **Application in limit - setting**: Explores the applications of the frequentist and Bayesian methods in limit - setting, such as using anchored confidence intervals and posterior quantiles for limit - setting. Overall, the goal of the paper is to provide a systematic methodological framework to help researchers make inferences and decisions more reliably in complex experiments.

Calibrating Model-Based Inferences and Decisions

Calibrated Bayes, for Statistics in General, and Missing Data in Particular

Robust Bayesian Inference for Berkson and Classical Measurement Error Models

Monte Carlo algorithms for model assessment via conflicting summaries

Bayesian Adaptive Calibration and Optimal Design

An Introduction to Inductive Statistical Inference: from Parameter Estimation to Decision-Making

From Uncertainty to Precision: Enhancing Binary Classifier Performance through Calibration

Calibrating Bayesian Learning via Regularization, Confidence Minimization, and Selective Inference

Conditional calibration and the sage statistician

Calibrate: Interactive Analysis of Probabilistic Model Output

A Generalized Bayesian Approach to Model Calibration

Calibrating Neural Simulation-Based Inference with Differentiable Coverage Probability

Non‐parametric inference on calibration of predicted risks

Model Misspecification in ABC: Consequences and Diagnostics

General Bayesian L2 calibration of mathematical models

Scalable simulation-based inference for implicitly defined models using a metamodel for Monte Carlo log-likelihood estimator

Joining Forces of Bayesian and Frequentist Methodology: A Study for Inference in the Presence of Non-Identifiability

Model-based Bayesian inference under computer assisted balance-improving designs

Decoupling Decision-Making in Fraud Prevention through Classifier Calibration for Business Logic Action

Calibrated Model Criticism Using Split Predictive Checks

Evaluating Posterior Probabilities: Decision Theory, Proper Scoring Rules, and Calibration