Multimodal Explanations: Justifying Decisions and Pointing to the Evidence

Dong Huk Park,Lisa Anne Hendricks,Zeynep Akata,Anna Rohrbach,Bernt Schiele,Trevor Darrell,Marcus Rohrbach
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.08129
2018-02-16
Abstract:Deep models that are both effective and explainable are desirable in many settings; prior explainable models have been unimodal, offering either image-based visualization of attention weights or text-based generation of post-hoc justifications. We propose a multimodal approach to explanation, and argue that the two modalities provide complementary explanatory strengths. We collect two new datasets to define and evaluate this task, and propose a novel model which can provide joint textual rationale generation and attention visualization. Our datasets define visual and textual justifications of a classification decision for activity recognition tasks (ACT-X) and for visual question answering tasks (VQA-X). We quantitatively show that training with the textual explanations not only yields better textual justification models, but also better localizes the evidence that supports the decision. We also qualitatively show cases where visual explanation is more insightful than textual explanation, and vice versa, supporting our thesis that multimodal explanation models offer significant benefits over unimodal approaches.
Artificial Intelligence,Computation and Language,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
What problem does this paper attempt to address?