Abstract:Consider the problem of learning, from non-experimental data, the causal (Markov equivalence) structure of the true, unknown causal Bayesian network (CBN) on a given, fixed set of (categorical) variables. This learning problem is known to be so hard that there is no learning algorithm that converges to the truth for all possible CBNs (on the given set of variables). So the convergence property has to be sacrificed for some CBNs---but for which? In response, the standard practice has been to design and employ learning algorithms that secure the convergence property for at least all the CBNs that satisfy the famous faithfulness condition, which implies sacrificing the convergence property for some CBNs that violate the faithfulness condition (Spirtes et al. 2000). This standard design practice can be justified by assuming---that is, accepting on faith---that the true, unknown CBN satisfies the faithfulness condition. But the real question is this: Is it possible to explain, without assuming the faithfulness condition or any of its weaker variants, why it is mandatory rather than optional to follow the standard design practice? This paper aims to answer the above question in the affirmative. We first define an array of modes of convergence to the truth as desiderata that might or might not be achieved by a causal learning algorithm. Those modes of convergence concern (i) how pervasive the domain of convergence is on the space of all possible CBNs and (ii) how uniformly the convergence happens. Then we prove a result to the following effect: for any learning algorithm that tackles the causal learning problem in question, if it achieves the best achievable mode of convergence (considered in this paper), then it must follow the standard design practice of converging to the truth for at least all CBNs that satisfy the faithfulness condition---it is a requirement, not an option.

On Learning Causal Structures from Non-Experimental Data without Any Faithfulness Assumption

Learning Cluster Causal Diagrams: an Information-Theoretic Approach

Nonlinearity, Feedback and Uniform Consistency in Causal Structural Learning

Learning Causal Structures Based on Divide and Conquer

Too Fast Causal Inference under Causal Insufficiency

Learning causal structures based on markov equivalence class

Mitigating Prior Errors in Causal Structure Learning: Towards LLM driven Prior Knowledge

Towards Practical Federated Causal Structure Learning

On Learning Necessary and Sufficient Causal Graphs

Recursively Learning Causal Structures Using Regression-based Conditional Independence Test

A General Framework for Constraint-based Causal Learning

Causal discovery using dynamically requested knowledge

Learning causal structures using hidden compact representation

GRACE-C: Generalized Rate Agnostic Causal Estimation via Constraints

Amortized learning of neural causal representations

LeCaSiM: Learning Causal Structure via Inverse of M-Matrices with Adjustable Coefficients

Learning and Testing Causal Models with Interventions

Dual Likelihood for Causal Inference under Structure Uncertainty

Causal Discovery under Latent Class Confounding

Online Causal Structure Learning in the Presence of Latent Variables

Optimization of Active Learning Strategies for Causal Network Structure