Abstract:Purpose Although current research has investigated how open research data (ORD) are published, researchers' behaviour of ORD sharing on academic social networks (ASNs) remains insufficiently explored. The purpose of this study is to investigate the connections between ORDs publication and social activity to uncover data literacy gaps. Design/methodology/approach This work investigates whether the ORDs publication leads to social activity around the ORDs and their linked published articles to uncover data literacy needs. The social activity was characterised as reads and citations, over the basis of a non-invasive approach supporting this preliminary study. The eventual associations between the social activity and the researchers' profile (scientific domain, gender, region, professional position, reputation) and the quality of the ORD published were investigated to complete this picture. A random sample of ORD items extracted from ResearchGate (752 ORDs) was analysed using quantitative techniques, including descriptive statistics, logistic regression and K-means cluster analysis. Findings The results highlight three main phenomena: (1) Globally, there is still an underdeveloped social activity around self-archived ORDs in ResearchGate, in terms of reads and citations, regardless of the published ORDs quality; (2) disentangling the moderating effects over social activity around ORD spots traditional dynamics within the “innovative” practice of engaging with data practices; (3) a somewhat similar situation of ResearchGate as ASN to other data platforms and repositories, in terms of social activity around ORD, was detected. Research limitations/implications Although the data were collected within a narrow period, the random data collection ensures a representative picture of researchers' practices. Practical implications As per the implications, the study sheds light on data literacy requirements to promote social activity around ORD in the context of open science as a desirable frontier of practice. Originality/value Researchers data literacy across digital systems is still little understood. Although there are many policies and technological infrastructure providing support, the researchers do not make an in-depth use of them. Peer review The peer-review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-05-2021-0255 .

Mining Open Government Data Used in Scientific Research

Mapping the Scientific Research on Open Data: A Bibliometric Review

Mapping the scientific research on open data: A bibliometric review: Mapping the scientific research on open data

Open Government Data (OGD) sites and the sharing of country-specific real-time pandemic information: An investigation into COVID-19 datasets available on worldwide OGDs

A Systematic Literature Review of Open Government Data Research: Challenges, Opportunities and Gaps

Citizen and Open Government: An Empirical Analysis of Antecedents of Open Government Data

Who Re-Uses Data? A Bibliometric Analysis of Dataset Citations

Unveiling the Mechanisms Behind Open Government Data Use: The Interplay of Internal Resources and Institutional Pressures

Visual Measurement Analysis of Domestic Data Governance Research based on CiteSpace

Ontology-Based Semantic Search for Open Government Data

Categorisation of Open Government Data Literature

Scientific literature text mining and the case for Open Access

Application of Open Data in Disaster Risk Research: A Preliminary Review Using Bibliometric Analysis

Data-Driven Innovation through Open Government Data

A taxonomy of open government data research areas and topics

Bibliometric and Text Mining Analysis of SDGs Governance Research

An Insight into the State of Big Data Research: A Bibliometric Study of Scientific Publications

The Rise of Open Science: Tracking the Evolution and Perceived Value of Data and Methods Link-Sharing Practices

Open government data from a legal perspective: An AI-driven systematic literature review

Exploring the social activity of open research data on ResearchGate: implications for the data literacy of researchers

An analysis of the effects of sharing research data, code, and preprints on citations