Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisal

Gary Marcus
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.00631
2018-01-02
Abstract:Although deep learning has historical roots going back decades, neither the term "deep learning" nor the approach was popular just over five years ago, when the field was reignited by papers such as Krizhevsky, Sutskever and Hinton's now classic (2012) deep network model of Imagenet. What has the field discovered in the five subsequent years? Against a background of considerable progress in areas such as speech recognition, image recognition, and game playing, and considerable enthusiasm in the popular press, I present ten concerns for deep learning, and suggest that deep learning must be supplemented by other techniques if we are to reach artificial general intelligence.
Artificial Intelligence,Machine Learning
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem this paper attempts to address is the evaluation of the limitations and future directions of deep learning technology in the current field of artificial intelligence. Specifically, the author Gary Marcus raises 10 concerns about deep learning and discusses the shortcomings of these technologies in achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI). The main purposes of the paper are: 1. **Evaluating the achievements and limitations of deep learning**: Although deep learning has made significant progress in areas such as image recognition, speech recognition, and gaming, the author believes that these achievements have begun to enter a stage of diminishing marginal returns. The paper explores the limitations of deep learning in terms of data requirements, generalization ability, learning abstract concepts, hierarchical processing, open reasoning, transparency, and integration of prior knowledge. 2. **Proposing future improvement directions**: The author suggests that in order to achieve more flexible and powerful artificial intelligence systems, deep learning needs to be combined with other technologies. These technologies may include symbolic reasoning, knowledge graphs, logical reasoning, etc., to compensate for the shortcomings of deep learning in handling complex tasks and abstract concepts. 3. **Promoting rational discussion**: The paper aims to provide researchers and non-expert readers with a comprehensive perspective to help them understand the current state of deep learning and its potential future development paths. Through critical analysis, the author hopes to inspire more discussions and research on how to improve existing technologies. In summary, the core issue of this paper is to explore whether deep learning can independently solve all artificial intelligence problems, and if not, how to combine it with other technologies to achieve a higher level of intelligence.