Abstract:Abstract Abstract 949 Introduction: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has a highly variable outcome, and individual risk assessment is largely based on clinical features. Gene expression profiling (GEP) stratifies patients into those with germinal center B-cell (GCB) and activated B-cell subtype (ABC) subtype with different prognoses. These groups have been shown to predict prognosis in patients treated with CHOP or R-CHOP. Conversely, the role of other recognized prognostic markers, such as BCL2 gene abnormalities or Bcl2 expression has been questioned in the new therapeutic era. Materials and Methods: In 438 patients treated with R-CHOP for de novo DLBCL, we analyzed the tumors by immunohistochemistry for Bcl2 protein expression and by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for BCL2 translocation and other abnormalities. All cases were successfully studied by GEP. The cutoff for Bcl2 protein expression, 60%, used as prognostic factor was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Results: The t(14;18)(q32;q21) was detected in 82 cases (18.7%) and BCL2 gains occurred in 63 cases (14.3%). Both t(14;18) and BCL2 gains strongly correlated with higher levels of Bcl2 protein expression (p<0.0001 for both). Presence of t(14;18) was associated with the GCB subtype (p<0.0001), whereas BCL2 gains were associated with the ABC subtype (p=0.004). BCL2 gains were not predictive of PFS in any patients' subgroups. Conversely, within the GCB subtype, patients with the t(14;18) displayed a significantly worse outcome compared to GCB patients without t(14;18) with a 5-year PFS of 45% vs 68%, respectively (p<0.0001). Outcome of patients with DLBCL associated with t(14;18) was similar to patients with the ABC subtype (45% vs 48%, p=0.30, Figure 1). No impact of the t(14;18) and BCL2 gains was observed on patients with ABC-DLBCL. Using immunohistochemistry, patients with Bcl2 positive (>60%) tumors had significantly inferior PFS in the GCB subgroup (p=0.03), but not in the ABC subgroup (p=0.54). Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of the t(14;18), but not Bcl2 protein expression, was independent of the International Prognostic Index in predicting outcome of our patients. Conclusions: Patients with the GCB subtype and t(14;18) exhibit a significantly worse prognosis than patients without t(14;18) when treated with R-CHOP. The assessment of t(14;18) by FISH approach not only functions as a valuable prognosticator for individual risk estimation in GCB-DLBCL patients in addition to the established parameters, but also provides valuable result for therapeutic intervention. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subgroups have distinct genetic profiles that influence tumor biology and improve gene-expression-based survival prediction

The t (14; 18)(q32; q21) characterizes a subset of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma of germinal center origin with poor outcome: Report from the international DLBCL …

The T(14;18)(Q32;Q21) Characterizes A Subset of Patients with Diffuse Large-B Cell Lymphoma of Germinal Center Origin with Poor Outcome: Report from the International Dlbcl Rituximab-Chop Consortium Program Study

MYC/BCL2 Protein Coexpression Contributes to the Inferior Survival of Activated B-cell Subtype of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma and Demonstrates High-Risk Gene Expression Signatures: a Report from the International DLBCL Rituximab-CHOP Consortium Program.

MYC/BCL2 protein coexpression contributes to the inferior survival of activated B cell subtype of diffuse large B cell lymphoma and demonstrates high risk gene expression …

MYC/BCL2 Protein Co-Expression Defines a Unique Subset of Aggressive Lymphoma and Contributes to the Inferior Prognosis of Activated B-cell Subtype of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: A Report from the International DLBCL Rituximab-CHOP Consortium Program Study

Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma of Germinal Center Origin with BCL2 Translocations Have Poor Outcome, Irrespective of MYC Status: a Report from an International DLBCL Rituximab-Chop Consortium Program Study.

Molecular subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma arise by distinct genetic pathways

A gene expression-based method to diagnose clinically distinct subgroups of diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling

Molecular subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma are associated with distinct pathogenic mechanisms and outcomes

Sequence analyses of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphomas unravel three genetic subgroups of patients and the GNA13 mutant as poor prognostic biomarker, results of LNH-EP1 study

Diagnostic and prognostic significance of gene expression profiling in lymphomas

Global Microrna Expression Profiling Uncovers Molecular Markers for Classification and Prognosis in Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma.

Whole Transcriptome Data Analysis Reveals Prognostic Signature Genes for Overall Survival Prediction in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

Evaluating cell-of-origin subtype methods for predicting diffuse large B-cell lymphoma survival: a meta-analysis of gene expression profiling and immunohistochemistry algorithms

Sinonasal DLBCL: molecular profiling identifies subtypes with distinctive prognosis and targetable genetic features

Genetic Subtyping and Phenotypic Characterization of the Immune Microenvironment and MYC/BCL2 Double Expression Reveal Heterogeneity in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Comprehensive gene expression profiling and immunohistochemical studies support application of immunophenotypic algorithm for molecular subtype classification in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a report from the International DLBCL Rituximab-CHOP Consortium Program Study

BCL2 translocation defines a unique tumor subset within the germinal center B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Determining Clinical Course of Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Using Targeted Transcriptome and Machine Learning Algorithms