Abstract:We study the efficiency of allocations in large markets with a network structure where every seller owns an edge in a graph and every buyer desires a path connecting some nodes. While it is known that stable allocations in such settings can be very inefficient, the exact properties of equilibria in markets with multiple sellers are not fully understood even in single-source single-sink networks. In this work, we show that for a large class of natural buyer demand functions, we are guaranteed the existence of an equilibrium with several desirable properties. The crucial insight that we gain into the equilibrium structure allows us to obtain tight bounds on efficiency in terms of the various parameters governing the market, especially the number of monopolies M. All of our efficiency results extend to markets without the network structure. While it is known that monopolies can cause large inefficiencies in general, our main results for single-source single-sink networks indicate that for several natural demand functions the efficiency only drops linearly with M. For example, for concave demand we prove that the efficiency loss is at most a factor 1+M/2 from the optimum, for demand with monotone hazard rate it is at most 1+M, and for polynomial demand the efficiency decreases logarithmically with M. In contrast to previous work that showed that monopolies may adversely affect welfare, our main contribution is showing that monopolies may not be as `evil' as they are made out to be; the loss in efficiency is bounded in many natural markets. Finally, we consider more general, multiple-source networks and show that in the absence of monopolies, mild assumptions on the network topology guarantee an equilibrium that maximizes social welfare.

Welfare reducing vertical integration in a bilateral monopoly under Nash bargaining

Does the Coexistence of Online and Offline Firms Improve Welfare

Welfare‐Increasing Monopolization

Strategic And Welfare Implications Of Product Bundling Under Bertrand Competition

A bargaining perspective on vertical integration

Procurement of advanced inputs and welfare-reducing vertical integration

Complementary inputs, outsourcing and vertical integration: Price versus quantity competition

Imported Inputs and Privatization in Downstream Mixed Oligopoly with Foreign Ownership

Anticompetitive Vertical Integration by a Dominant Firm

Non-cooperative corporate social responsibility, bargaining, and double marginalization in bilateral monopoly

Equilibrium vertical structure with a common supplier

Corporate Social Responsibility and International Competition: A Welfare Analysis

Markets Beyond Nash Welfare for Leontief Utilities

A Comparison of Optimal Tariffs and Welfare under No Lobbying, Domestic Lobbying and Domestic‐foreign Lobbying

Co-opetition under Endogenous Bargaining Power

Price Competition in Networked Markets: How do monopolies impact social welfare?

Vertical integration and capacity investment in the electricity sector

On the Ratio of Revenue to Welfare in Single-Parameter Mechanism Design

Decentralization and Consumer Welfare with Substitutes or Complements

Direct-to-Consumer Sales by Manufacturers and Bargaining

A Welfare Ranking of Multilateral Reductions in Real and Tariff Trade Barriers when Firms are Heterogenous