Mass violence and mental health
J. Cox,H. Ghodse
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540260701349415
2007-01-01
International Review of Psychiatry
Abstract:Worldwide, in the first year of the new millennium, more than 300,000 people died as a direct result of violent conflicts. These deaths were not spread uniformly across the world but ranged from less than one per 100,000 in high-income countries to 6.2 per 100,000 in lowand middle-income countries. The consequences of violence are not limited to death. Torture, rape and violation of human rights are also used to terrorize and undermine communities, affecting them not only in terms of direct physical injury but also with effects on mental health and subsequent physical illness and disability (WHO, 2002). Destitute states whose governments have collapsed provide fertile ground for the planning and preparation of these appalling acts of violence (Ghodse, 2006). Such events have a very long history, perhaps dating back to the very first human societies. They were undoubtedly employed deliberately by powerful states to create the historic, global empires of past millennia. However, the spectacular nature of recent events, with large numbers of civilian casualties, combined with the fact that they are now vividly reported worldwide, often within minutes, has made the world community feel very vulnerable. Specifically, major acts of violence, carried out by a small number of individuals in the cities of industrialized countries have made the consequences of mass violence much more real to populations who have escaped this experience for decades. It is now clear that no one and no place is truly secure while violence is endemic in various parts of the world. There are of course many other types of violent behaviour in every society. These occur within and between families, in local neighbourhoods, streets and communities and include self-inflicted injuries and suicide as well as homicide and other acts of violence. Such is their frequency that they no longer attract much attention in the media unless they are against groups perceived as particularly defenceless such as children and the elderly, when they initiate community soul-searching and public enquiries. In general, however, non-conflict societal violence occurs so frequently that such events have almost been ‘normalized’. They are often seen as an inevitable part of the human condition, and are usually considered as ‘law and order’ issues. Taken together, according to WHO, an estimated 1.6 million people worldwide lost their lives to violence in 2000. About half of the deaths were attributed to suicide, nearly one-third were due to homicide, and about one-fifth were casualties of armed conflicts (WHO, 2002). Because of the frequency of such events, and despite their normalization, they contribute to and accentuate feelings of insecurity within the community and lead to fearfulness and anxiety. However, this sort of violence is not generally considered to be susceptible to prevention, except perhaps in the context of completing risk assessments on particular individuals and in developing localized projects to promote