Abstract:Background: Within the structural and grammatical bounds of a common language, all authors develop their own distinctive writing styles. Whether the relative occurrence of common words can be measured to produce accurate models of authorship is of particular interest. This work introduces a new score that helps to highlight such variations in word occurrence, and is applied to produce models of authorship of a large group of plays from the Shakespearean era. Methodology: A text corpus containing 55,055 unique words was generated from 168 plays from the Shakespearean era (16th and 17th centuries) of undisputed authorship. A new score, CM1, is introduced to measure variation patterns based on the frequency of occurrence of each word for the authors John Fletcher, Ben Jonson, Thomas Middleton and William Shakespeare, compared to the rest of the authors in the study (which provides a reference of relative word usage at that time). A total of 50 WEKA methods were applied for Fletcher, Jonson and Middleton, to identify those which were able to produce models yielding over 90% classification accuracy. This ensemble of WEKA methods was then applied to model Shakespearean authorship across all 168 plays, yielding a Matthews' correlation coefficient (MCC) performance of over 90%. Furthermore, the best model yielded an MCC of 99%. Conclusions: Our results suggest that different authors, while adhering to the structural and grammatical bounds of a common language, develop measurably distinct styles by the tendency to over-utilise or avoid particular common words and phrasings. Considering language and the potential of words as an abstract chaotic system with a high entropy, similarities can be drawn to the Maxwell's Demon thought experiment; authors subconsciously favour or filter certain words, modifying the probability profile in ways that could reflect their individuality and style.

Quantifying genre: an operational definition of tragedy and comedy based on Shakespeare's plays

Topic Modeling Genre: An Exploration of French Classical and Enlightenment Drama

Mapping the links between gender, status and genre in Shakespeare’s plays

Dramatic Structure and Social Status in Shakespeare’s Plays

Tragic and Comical Networks. Clustering Dramatic Genres According to Structural Properties

A data science and machine learning approach to continuous analysis of Shakespeare's plays

Creativity Complicates Tweets: a Quantitative Lens on Syntactic Characteristics of Twitter

Language Individuation and Marker Words: Shakespeare and His Maxwell's Demon

A Study on the Expression Techniques of Three Composers on the Time of Genre Transference in the Play 《Romeo and Juliet》

Changes in the length of speeches in the plays of William Shakespeare and his contemporaries: A mixed models approach

Application of Quantitative Characteristics of Chinese Genres in Text Clustering

A semiotic interpretation of genre: Judgments as an example

An Analysis of Shakespeare’s Hamlet Through Terry Eagleton’s Conception of Tragedy

Multiple regression techniques for modeling dates of first performances of Shakespeare-era plays

Modes of Interpretation of «The Tragedy of Coriolanus» by W. Shakespeare

Genre Effect on L2 Syntactic Complexity and Holistic Rating for Writing Quality of Intermediate EFL Learners

A Study of Minor Characters in William Shakespeare’s Great Tragedies.

A Cognitive Approach to the Author: OnShakespeare's Brainby Mary T.Crane

LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF SEMANTIC INNOVATIONS IN ENGLISH RENAISSANCE AND MODERN TRAGIC WORKS

Strategic use of English quantifiers in the reporting of quantitative information

Issues and challenges in compiling a corpus of Early Modern English plays for comparison with those of William Shakespeare