The significance of cerebellar contributions in early-life through aging
Jessica L. Verpeut,Marlies Oostland
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2024.1449364
IF: 3.387
2024-10-09
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Abstract:IntroductionCerebellar microanatomy has inspired many computational models that contribute to both motor and nonmotor function. Key contributors to understanding cerebellar function, including Marr, Albus, and Ito, described error signals within the cerebellum that drive synaptic plasticity and contribute to motor learning (Marr, 1969; Albus, 1971; Ito, 1972). These error signals within the cerebellum are the result of comparing motor output with sensory feedback from the environment. The resulting predictions and corrections for movement are transferred to output regions via bidirectional connections between the cerebellum and cortical regions. The establishment of these pathways in development and plasticity occurs early in life. Gross cerebellar development including the migration, growth, and maturation of neurons continues after birth, up to three weeks postnatally in rodents and one year postnatally in humans (Ten Donkelaar and Lammens, 2009). Total cerebellar volume continues to expand until adolescence, peaking earlier for girls (around 12 years of age) than for boys (around 16 years of age), similar to cerebral volume (Tiemeier et al., 2010). However, compared to other brain regions involved in aging such as the hippocampus, the aging cerebellum and its contribution to neurodegenerative diseases has received less attention. Recent evidence has shown that cerebellar connections become dysregulated in aging and may contribute to cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD), schizophrenia, and Parkinson's disease (Andersen et al., 2012; Douaud et al., 2014; Gellersen et al., 2021). Here, we argue that there are long-term consequences of atypical cerebellar development (Figure 1), and that patterns of cerebellar abnormality may be different between males and females. Furthermore, different patterns of cerebellar abnormality may explain both the diversity and variation of phenotypes in neurodevelopmental disorders and aging dementias. In this review we will largely focus on the prefrontal cortex, due to the significance of this region in cognitive and social behavior. Understanding how cerebellar-cerebrum networks break down in disease pathologies can lead to further understanding of neural networks and improve future therapeutics.Brain-wide cerebellar circuits can explain diversity in cerebellum-mediated phenotypes The cerebellum projects disynaptically to all of neocortex as well as subcortical areas, including regions important for cognition and affective behavior, such as the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), parietal cortex, and amygdala (Sveljo et al., 2014; Onuki et al., 2015; Pisano et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2023). The largest cells of the cerebellar cortex, Purkinje cells, integrate information from ~70 billion neurons in the cerebellar cortex (Lange, 1975). GABAergic Purkinje cells are the only neuron type whose axon leaves the cerebellar cortex to synapse onto cells in the cerebellar nuclei (CN), therefore modulating excitatory CN output to the rest of the brain (Houck and Person, 2014; Judd et al., 2021). In addition, cerebellar output is transferred from the cerebellar cortex to the cerebellar nuclei in unique functional microzones which are organized in a largely lobule-dependent manner (Schweighofer, 1998; Kostadinov et al., 2019; De Zeeuw, 2021). The CN have direct connections with the thalamus, the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and dozens of different nuclei across the brain, and thereby indirect connections with the rest of the brain (Hoshi et al., 2005; Bostan and Strick, 2010; Watabe-Uchida et al., 2012; Hunnicutt et al., 2014; Houck and Person, 2015; Carta et al., 2019; Sathyamurthy et al., 2020; Kebschull et al., 2024; Washburn et al., 2024). In this way, cerebellar output can have widespread influence on the rest of the brain, including cognitive- and socially-associated brain regions. In humans, Purkinje and granule cells are born and migrate starting at 7 weeks of age (van der Heijden and Sillitoe, 2021), then undergo multiple phases of plasticity and pruning prior to maturation in adulthood. During early development, neurons are sensitive to environmental stimuli as they undergo growth, differentiation, and pruning (Huttenlocher and Dabholkar, 1997). Cerebellar long-range synaptic connectivity, plasticity, and functional activity may be particularly vulnerable in early-life. Hence, there is a need to define causal links between cerebellar plasticity, circuit development, and behavior. Mouse models of social and cognitive deficits exhibit altered expression of signaling molecules and inhibitory circuits resulting in disruption of the excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) balance, reduced cortical connectivity, reduced gray matter, shorter axons, and reduced spine numbers (Schofield et al., 2011; Portera-Cailliau, 2012; Stoya et al., 2014; Shapiro et al., 2017). However, the role of cerebellar-thalamic-corti -Abstract Truncated-
neurosciences,mathematical & computational biology