Comparison of extraction methods in vitro Plasmodium falciparum: A 1H NMR and LC-MS joined approach

Lúcia Mamede,Fanta Fall,Matthieu Schoumacher,Allison Ledoux,Céline Bugli,Pascal De Tullio,Joëlle Quetin-Leclercq,Bernadette Govaerts,Michel Frédérich
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2024.149684
IF: 3.1
2024-04-01
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
Abstract:Malaria is a parasitic disease that remains a global concern and the subject of many studies. Metabolomics has emerged as an approach to better comprehend complex pathogens and discover possible drug targets, thus giving new insights that can aid in the development of antimalarial therapies. However, there is no standardized method to extract metabolites from in vitro Plasmodium falciparum intraerythrocytic parasites, the stage that causes malaria. Additionally, most methods are developed with either LC-MS or NMR analysis in mind, and have rarely been evaluated with both tools. In this work, three extraction methods frequently found in the literature were reproduced and samples were analyzed through both LC-MS and <sup>1</sup>H NMR, and evaluated in order to reveal which is the most repeatable and consistent through an array of different tools, including chemometrics, peak detection and annotation. The most reliable method in this study proved to be a double extraction with methanol and methanol/water (80:20, v/v). Metabolomic studies in the field should move towards standardization of methodologies and the use of both LC-MS and <sup>1</sup>H NMR in order to make data more comparable between studies and facilitate the achievement of biologically interpretable information.
biochemistry & molecular biology,biophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?