[Specific features of the early diagnosis of prostate cancer in the presence of neurogenic bladder]

A Gignoux,E Chartier-Kastler,A Ruffion
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1166-7087(07)92348-9
Abstract:Due to their increased life expectancy, a growing number of neurological patients, particularly spinal cord injury patients, develop prostate cancer. Although prostate cancer appears to be slightly less frequent in spinal cord injury patients than in the general population (level of proof 3b), especially in the case of high and severe spinal cord injury (level of proof 3b), there is evidence to suggest that prostate cancer is responsible for morbidity (level of proof 4) and excess mortality (level of proof 5) in neurological patients with a life expectancy greater than 10 or 15 years. According to urology society guidelines, prostate cancer screening should be proposed to neurological patients with a life expectancy greater than 10 or 15 years (level of proof 5), particularly paraplegics aged 50 to 60 or 65 years. As in the general population, this screening could be based on digital rectal examination and annual PSA assay, which can still be interpreted, even in patients performing intermittent catheterization (level of proof 3b). However; PSA cannot be used in patients with an indwelling catheter (level of proof 3b). The histological diagnosis is based on prostatic biopsies, which should probably be preceded by systematic urine culture with appropriate antibiotic therapy, if necessary, to limit the risk of infection (level of proof 5). The treatment of localized prostate cancer in neurological patients, as in the general population, is based on radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy. The indication must be adapted to each patient, taking into account the voiding mode and urodynamic assessment of lower urinary tract function. Brachytherapy does not appear to be an appropriate treatment modality because of its adverse effects (level of proof 5).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?