Abstract:Abstract Academic resilience refers to students’ capacity to perform highly despite a disadvantaged background. Although most studies using international large-scale assessment (ILSA) data defined academic resilience with two criteria, student background and achievement, their conceptualizations and operationalizations varied substantially. In a systematic review, we identified 20 ILSA studies applying different criteria, different approaches to setting thresholds (the same fixed ones across countries or relative country-specific ones), and different threshold levels. Our study on the validity of these differences and how they affected the composition of academically resilient students revealed that the classification depended heavily on the threshold applied. When a fixed background threshold was applied, the classification was likely to be affected by the developmental state of a country. This could result in an overestimation of the proportions of academically resilient students in some countries while an underestimation in others. Furthermore, compared to the application of a social or economic capital indication, applying a cultural capital indicator may lead to lower shares of disadvantaged students classified as academically resilient. The composition of academically resilient students varied significantly by gender and language depending on which indicator of human capital or which thresholds were applied reflecting underlying societal characteristics. Conclusions drawn from such different results depending on the specific conceptualizations and operationalizations would vary greatly. Finally, our study utilizing PISA 2015 data from three countries representing diverse cultures and performance levels revealed that a stronger sense of belonging to a school significantly increased the chances to be classified as academically resilient in Peru, but not in Norway or Hong Kong. In contrast, absence from school was significantly associated with academic resilience in Norway and Hong Kong, but not in Peru.

Re‐examining the relationship between patience, risk‐taking, and human capital investment across countries

Parents’ Education Is More Important Than Their Wealth in Shaping Their Children’s Intelligence: Results of 19 Samples in Seven Countries at Different Developmental Levels

PISA, global reference societies, and policy borrowing: The promises and pitfalls of ‘academic resilience’

Patience among children

Is knowledge capital theory degenerate? PIAAC, PISA, and economic growth

Human Capital and the Lifetime Costs of Impatience

The effects of language on patience: an experimental replication study of the linguistic-savings hypothesis in Austria

Cognitive Endurance, Talent Selection, and the Labor Market Returns to Human Capital

Children’s patience and school-track choices several years later: Linking experimental and field data

Patience and Comparative Development

Heterogeneous human capital, inequality and growth: The role of patience and skills

Parent-Child Information Frictions and Human Capital Investment: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Patience decreases with age for the poor but not for the rich: an international comparison

Human capital risk and portfolio choices: Evidence from university admission discontinuities

Non-Cognitive Abilities and Spanish Regional Differences in Student Performance in PISA 2009

Academic Resilience: What Schools and Countries Do to Help Disadvantaged Students Succeed in PISA. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 167.

Lessons Learned from PISA: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Articles on the Programme for International Student Assessment

How human capital, universities of excellence, third party funding, mobility and gender explain productivity in German political science

Academic resilience: underlying norms and validity of definitions

Risks to Human Capital