Acenocoumarol Pharmacogenetic Dosing Algorithm versus Usual Care in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Randomised Clinical Trial
Hoi Yan Tong,Alberto M Borobia,Manuel Quintana-Díaz,Sara Fabra,Manuel González-Viñolis,Carmen Fernández-Capitán,María A Rodriguez-Dávila,Alicia Lorenzo,Ana María López-Parra,Nuria Ruiz-Giménez,Francisco Abad-Santos,Carmen Suarez,Olga Madridano,Jorge Francisco Gómez-Cerezo,Pilar Llamas,Carlos Baeza-Richer,Eduardo Arroyo-Pardo,Antonio J Carcas,The Pgx-Ace Spanish Investigators Group,Hoi Tong,Alberto Borobia,María Rodriguez-Dávila,Ana López-Parra,Jorge Gómez-Cerezo,Antonio Carcas,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132949
IF: 3.9
2021-06-30
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Abstract:Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) require immediate treatment with anticoagulants such as acenocoumarol. This multicentre randomised clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of a dosing pharmacogenetic algorithm versus a standard-of-care dose adjustment at the beginning of acenocoumarol treatment. We included 144 patients with VTE. On the day of recruitment, a blood sample was obtained for genotyping (CYP2C9*2, CYP2C9*3, VKORC1, CYP4F2, APOE). Dose adjustment was performed on day 3 or 4 after the start of treatment according to the assigned group and the follow-up was at 12 weeks. The principal variable was the percentage of patients with an international normalised ratio (INR) within the therapeutic range on day 7. Thirty-four (47.2%) patients had an INR within the therapeutic range at day 7 after the start of treatment in the genotype-guided group compared with 14 (21.9%) in the control group (p = 0.0023). There were no significant differences in the time to achieve a stable INR, the number of INRs within the range in the first 6 weeks and at the end of study. Our results suggest the use of a pharmacogenetic algorithm for patients with VTE could be useful in achieving target INR control in the first days of treatment.
medicine, general & internal